From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: yes-or-no-p prompt conditionally broken in master? Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 21:27:41 +0300 Message-ID: <55E8911D.4020906@yandex.ru> References: <83k2s7a247.fsf@gnu.org> <55E88336.5060703@yandex.ru> <83h9nb9z5l.fsf@gnu.org> <55E8879B.9050107@yandex.ru> <83fv2v9y9z.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1441304889 7480 80.91.229.3 (3 Sep 2015 18:28:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 18:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kaushal.modi@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 03 20:28:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXZF0-0001x3-N1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 20:28:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50989 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXZF0-0005bc-KD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38075) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXZEm-0005bT-7W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:27:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXZEj-0003RV-30 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:27:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]:37318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXZEi-0003RR-So; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:27:49 -0400 Original-Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so61418011wic.0; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:27:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hths1oHriFl7zNDLmGucbkJ8+cVlT+tFNhcotTUAgaQ=; b=KEx25f9dApa+VxxBluX7AFs3d0zcTOUqs4JmDPYfzopj4e4AD03zm22jxgIiMoOj2u 0YYwbYGooYTuebjY9NJ1zNlPRmmLO06rtPJAIz2xUhi+dfFafDSL8qXBKipBF+sMtW6c iKjFsUahcZPN1Glq/Pnpsx/B2BhSRAPv6tBkHDAmaa+iUUCqxLvohrwUIwiY8qNhIVsI aH44LWQ/aV8y4AMrEmoAyj9s1DneJt32/MV8t+hqWTOlmnSs5i7ozJVk4uDi6/PNYG12 Eo53sWWb45+B4xTppsw7A3w0XR4SjieyQVM3IyYnlQixWc5BQVK2O/S9zgTZTnR7iY5x nxKw== X-Received: by 10.194.134.98 with SMTP id pj2mr23662215wjb.30.1441304868347; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ir5sm39009686wjb.23.2015.09.03.11.27.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:27:47 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/40.0 In-Reply-To: <83fv2v9y9z.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189543 Archived-At: On 09/03/2015 09:02 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Then we should not use yes-or-no-p there, but y-or-n-p. I can't think of a place where I'd really have been better served by yes-or-no-p (personally). But yes-or-no-p is a good default overall. So I believe we should support this use case, via defalias or some other, more appropriate, way.