From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: use-hard-newlines Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:36:23 +0200 Message-ID: <55E00167.8030300@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440744438 16180 80.91.229.3 (28 Aug 2015 06:47:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 06:47:18 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 28 08:47:08 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVDRL-00029A-T5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:47:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46264 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVDRG-0006Jw-2V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 02:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVDRD-0006Jm-1b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 02:46:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVDR8-0004LO-2b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 02:46:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:57208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVDH3-0007hu-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 02:36:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([95.119.60.156]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MBSfG-1ZO6WY3Q3S-00ASBT for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:36:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:n14uyJ9RwOXLOXCLSHtZ05AkuwWXq7kj6Ly4a0jKJDLDzV9SzBS 8827/P+u3sHzq3Wr7vsIfyD+TiXCHdf+JZ74BguOBBBeCkvXPqTDOBHSSjieF1do3A6+uCv WqB8qpykBSSixoLuRp9CiyY6MsmJM1OT/+eNwBW7FLMyn5va9PSfgMhevrk/aCCECO5pqd5 rrFt2oi6pd7+dGHlILq6A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:j8RGIGAK488=:67RQtxVLOTh615pY97yyDd 5ZufVaVTLShjpz2pxvr8XQ4nbpk7rm0eExhkFDIoFhjfIKQLhZnIAKP8m04bF8TH3LrX2c4Au xg8qe8Zs/gw73v9Ibte7VYMm8wSflDZcJ2Mr4SROjlbfiA9OaImrexgViNuVtA3oBcsPxhuJM WQjmcpqRqIpsd8vRBeXdeoofV9y7gEZu73R42FvGyv4W7+lB82PUtVMh67AbaYXO6qn/vf0U7 Qp1JNuM91PaO7mjx0wAaRH1vK0fXkpBaGEmmSyIu9B1YbtOFNE8scHt+CLadT3utTQcSL9rmA FegW6839safj96D1X6O6X/526grFKc/okauofW1Qk94vh62HWHcu4uVwFkcB1Rm5tNxuYXMaW nDL7/addNg5XJieSilVoiwrd8FNgeq2RR45798vtQuom2b99YdA1dslvDq2CUR8yZD3Uxn4F2 WNmd7JUbSc83J96Lh29VmlgGPsPr+jBnQQ/U8oJZe4miDvvzYmgdFfaCb4pxGf+m8I6fh6o0I 53J7Ddi/H2NN3GA4wtuAykb7RyI1DPRICycUL7PsK3IBa/OHSgOSe5WKIEq0nRK47QPV7La9r krAAnphVZoxy7UXdx+07MKG8p9UDJySjT/oTt/o5UUeVH84QY/yTAcweA0qVhq5KWBGDgf7FG O5w/dmtZ1Lfn+DwzpQfQkve7vuaVC05klqW7mgjo4PWmNCXqwddJSk6vdUxVbmkLBc9UIptsh jAdBbU2P84d9FYS7 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.13 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189244 Archived-At: Hi all, is the concept of use-hard-newlines still considered useful? Just looking how to simplify fill-paragraph. AFAICS it introduces complexity which doesn't contribute, not reallly. Cheers, Andreas