From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fill-paragraph ill designed Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:30:26 +0200 Message-ID: <55DD5D02.9090407@online.de> References: <55DC2621.4030905@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440570666 16982 80.91.229.3 (26 Aug 2015 06:31:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tassilo Horn , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 26 08:30:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUUET-0000N2-25 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:30:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUUES-0007LB-1P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 02:30:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53795) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUUEP-0007L5-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 02:30:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUUEO-0005kh-AC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 02:30:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:58961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUUEI-0005k4-Fl; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 02:30:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([77.6.218.200]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MV4iD-1ZDeD802A9-00YPbZ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:30:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:bcW0tqPv2fJNHNt3bSjwu6dY5ayTUN1p5V45Ue04mmsbq5BSvMs YAxNnuTwRFN6R/NJZGgmTJfOkfIKjYzL1ZP7CXs4izljvTol8+v91Zm/lPDe1aR+4eZAkp8 Sv2HN409+xR0nENEoLH5VQzNIj9snphQuD15r3GpBPFv1vG8tjO4oQJjBjGurzi2ne29sAm fi2+mwZR2gRDkKtkC18Vg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:QRlsqDTUNKM=:kbkLrrYt4D0gsDHszznD91 bt7RSro0OeGPjaaz0YmlLDURF1Rqdx0JhW4pPkJyecJAsB31l26zYXFrOIMNsAUYib3tTP0vN N581cPlEIZ2cW1ISPkYeZpNWkZPPv/sDNFp9n4dxwZaSaPzSTxAzdWY/LU6Cfsn/xGFtIo8GF Gy4u7lVgcJ1sSfkuLSq6sbBBUgx5ybwL8xv+N6YSgM4JCFvcXACPYa20zD7y/zfqKFPynuS3e kT6Brturtolp1YcXhn7rlyQ2YRKlQImdghemD/J/FEku+tDn/GWreiVoAj+ILVDG8+s4fELa+ U8RvU3T2DUj5gveZgScJ9oxxZ12HYUO4pZpxzODu6yAE+/PDY1nQqHCNKdpU7w0XQBdTvjo3q mlE5st6cWZHpQN4rIOj+8dGK3JhdoqCZxn/FvF2DGLbkkuZCd9cO4ZbxoeKGXgcavecVYZ+p4 OfT3JaNUWMuGgQhGkbwBQZj8u9Hw79/Y3TK8tMo8mSun+ZjPRb2f5Uoj5NhW9JHvyGmFSyleb 9lWuuWn/Te8euKyGMBtGINNziCrotnWtZ0zu1QpVzgK6rUBJAq57qh/rcSFXUxrBoQUd+gATY iKvEd9fNL8gCecLoKtY1AW0r4CPHA2bqqfxxUGjO0kr1bBCwtXlelXz+0V8JIz5X4Da2S77+R XeFXflxvFBPubwUv/Cs5LbHfWmOG9NfVy5guXImCw0sm3l0VtpXIeo39EuLq0Ds2Ij4i1ZxSL bWy5vtt5/RWdnh59 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.24 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189188 Archived-At: Am 26.08.2015 um 00:14 schrieb Richard Stallman: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > There is a lot of ugliness in the way fill-paragraph works, > but developing a replacement that works ok in practice is harder > than it looks. I recall a time that we tried. > What would prevent switching the clauses as suggested?