From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21305: 25.0.50; `get-buffer-window-list' doc - what order? Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:28:06 +0200 Message-ID: <55D74386.6010708@gmx.at> References: <<089f48ed-6ce9-4753-abcf-3f86d43a278e@default>> <<83vbc8iyut.fsf@gnu.org>> <5430f5a7-2939-4f96-8c6c-3e820ffcfd6b@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440170960 15451 80.91.229.3 (21 Aug 2015 15:29:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21305@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 21 17:29:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSoFh-0007xA-8E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:29:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42092 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSoFg-00075r-F4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSoFe-00075W-1A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:29:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSoFa-0005lv-Sp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42423) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSoFa-0005lr-Pl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSoFa-0002jO-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21305 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21305-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21305.144017090110436 (code B ref 21305); Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21305) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2015 15:28:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34630 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSoEu-0002iF-EN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:28:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:55458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSoEs-0002i7-9L for 21305@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [178.190.166.34] ([178.190.166.34]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MdEsh-1ZAJW70rQZ-00IRYz; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:28:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5430f5a7-2939-4f96-8c6c-3e820ffcfd6b@default> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:n4Joa6+U7vMEFU2TeTQwh8DF5xy1sPYBintkQNWfdCzUvyd70RV mcgNHc4AGbyC0L/FqDypAAXzZLa/PrN/hRSbOOu9CdFIRWwHGgfa/Y05VT6jp9e7l1MWh8X 0ICOCe/OQbT6BXV/TF3H/fSjmyF+YowDJqoStZnTmfagqsWw32CSuSEf9ZLG1LXJKU0BK2s LrOnTGx1wXW7CgohdNemw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:fc1jeTKufvw=:GQPJDHX5/DFEN6W6yVQ48o Bcsk6Rlg4ywLTWqW9enEiXtbHmN92dLAHON0vjh8LHzuBN5Ycf/OVlj2XiKbxkJHwx6BUvNjB hRkRZaqEPNGoWr8LOqzq6WZz8yD1am4x45s/WBLVtQ3mjKkKtC0wCRXdUocDQf7ZuDhw1KYgS 9PDl0ResSc6c0eTVFBDTV1Tr+/PzCojlSHLTFr8JMSMHk/ZesQLWJtzOWJZNE6SSmeCcdSq0a R2djUIcL/RU2W7bqsyuWNfOVw4MAJYQjKcnvlHux/uBWIQmga7kYGzwcbHgzhzacv9wL2yyJf LKPfQQLWHYnDg6A2O7Vurf5fuAofpSJ0T9uy2pt3SSzT49evMHGQaX3BHk6PlUd5OJkdTEXv5 2W/V/6LrTo+qO0zZMhSlHgAdKGc+zxRBakpgBchUHTliP1+pzgRFGwV/M4EX7sSFKHDKf6y25 IMpMW3SwklrmrjzaI9EiAOaBY4HzVRuwkzZ8h+G5T9wPjE5UmYYkGrBhWuBpWgMrzXH4xB+nO KaBZZacvKfSnmBa/7QlLN8/1gc0p7casAd05jjPlySUg2/Pct4tNqn0rlNwr24pGp0/R1P1fe KSDhFs0JSUQ1XDzQCtGqEgYWB2jeyY+MjJqAwYoKuWkQJ3/vUwSHw/T1sHJ1wQRq1hDgTJUCf q3UzCWCxoQFHvhTmP8rFd2oiw04MeF0vQZ8oohEzFj2TMqQcAjB5PNX43eHwgA5ZBAp+BJoxr GlLs+7YT7iah/wicUOoAy12BxzY+Yc9uiTkl+A== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:105663 Archived-At: > But as one user I'm disappointed. I was hoping for a usable > window order. In fact, I was hoping for something similar to > `buffer-list' - hoping that users would get a list of the windows > (displaying a particular buffer) in order of their last use. > > I know no way to obtain such a list, but if there is one, please > be so kind as to let me know. `walk-windows' etc. go through > windows in their "structural" order, but how can I tell, given > a list of windows showing a given buffer, which were last used > after which others? > > Yes, my question is outside the scope of this bug (if the list > `get-buffer-window-list' has no order we can depend on or even > if its order is unrelated to the chronological order of access). I suppose you mean that we should document `window-use-time' too. Correct? martin