From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: xref and leaving "temporary" buffers open Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:47:34 +0200 Message-ID: <55BF0E86.6090801@gmx.at> References: <55B2DC8F.3050305@yandex.ru> <55B3489C.2070009@gmx.at> <55B390CE.6020104@yandex.ru> <55B3994A.5010709@gmx.at> <55B3A0B6.6080101@yandex.ru> <55B3B0FC.3080004@gmx.at> <55B3EDBD.8050409@yandex.ru> <55B4C439.1040909@gmx.at> <55B4E5B3.3000108@yandex.ru> <55B65610.7070308@gmx.at> <55B77C57.6010306@yandex.ru> <55B82F77.3090204@yandex.ru> <55BECE10.90800@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438584481 2462 80.91.229.3 (3 Aug 2015 06:48:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 06:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Dmitry Gutov , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 03 08:47:52 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM9XL-0003Gm-Hi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:47:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57746 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM9XL-0003CQ-20 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 02:47:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM9XH-0003CH-Ls for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 02:47:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM9XD-00006F-6z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 02:47:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:61293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM9XC-00005R-Tp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 02:47:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [93.82.74.40] ([93.82.74.40]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MhMg2-1ZYszz0JCU-00Mcj4; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:47:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55BECE10.90800@yandex.ru> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5rbCAK6h8GrjxiKPETx+jlPYkbXoKX17HEv9J2U9+FWhrugbwkZ 5cfFVl7dAC/g++i8XZCUwYZwNuRXCWntpxRA/iU4xG7oXTFIur24J3L4yOF0qEd6bp08uh0 h6Jh6YZGSS23CEZBW1L5PWi75mHEycDKZkK+MOiZbRKnGM7XMxzPpl32x5sNs9FvQLE99Xx +toBFIT+sHViR1KG/x/sQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:JpNrFjKFCGU=:9Tk7oTCf1PZ74UFq19zRKc +CUtM+Jjj5EKvV2Oqz0NZvRR5oQvjCqEMPtx5ZtecdSRcL/+T0PiQGexOiX6/CF7dhXtJF1zO lLiqCv/6f3c2CjlNULJylh3HVtSDCG0Lke75rI7xS7DPujdycn4Do50b4CYSBdVV5ry93K2/Y 6vr1bjv0zvI1FsV1jAwmjrcmx7hheOzMd+jrx6luO0uKQZL+8cphvFuCnhFES0+RCuzpx74lO X2W2DkOCwVnxuPx5VH8BrenZrxqtJyRJG3wJLvt5RLJ4yU9XpS1btoiH1MKNW2i2b9WKlqDpB WbOxud6m0BO/oXIvOtta9MI1dDsXM4749dP+Ep5vK5mRUNE82p2tIv5mud23zl8c/oNbpg3ol 3W2g/YsGL/sHahHmyb3ItGKZfq9ISvlN4Iqi6Y472sSIhC1QGFR6i/4LXNVH5lYf12mZtCRQd YPH6x9mmzjh9QSBERPPowZWlzIMQdLU4aVy7iwR5DoDcORnRp/pCOBy9oKZcxdq5Ued5SziuQ 3sNivvgopurgk4+DHCHi4pDIULrgi/IoT0sinIFvtdrsqj9XWEhZtoOTC4wqwsjuIoNbpspvi ijX1PXlYtLFXcogEMJq7KKO9857IMJPLSojOh72RrJzYn0MiqX6rFXakMOktTHRWMUMOVmWB8 hBWaE8pCOoZ6iB0nR9A0Vv+kqQmvlQFAYIY6KtrldmecG1CGAzawwzHCkGDyp47ltz4c= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188320 Archived-At: > We'll need to also catch the moment, somehow, when an "incomplete" > buffer become displayed as a result of user's action. And "complete" > its initialization at that point. Would you use > window-configuration-change-hook for that? That's too late. The operation in question is `find-file-noselect' which has to find out whether the file is already visited in some hidden/incomplete/delayed/retarded way. martin