From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master c4151eb: Improve the optional translation of quotes Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:24:05 +0300 Message-ID: <55BBCB55.1080400@yandex.ru> References: <20150619073901.5856.32718@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <55870BD2.6040706@yandex.ru> <558716E9.30903@cs.ucla.edu> <55871721.5060709@yandex.ru> <55871883.7080600@cs.ucla.edu> <55871E96.2020506@yandex.ru> <558722C0.5040702@cs.ucla.edu> <55874E55.4020501@yandex.ru> <5587B029.5000503@cs.ucla.edu> <55882522.3030305@yandex.ru> <5588F071.7030501@cs.ucla.edu> <55893B2D.40506@yandex.ru> <558A3F12.3080005@cs.ucla.edu> <558BF993.2010105@yandex.ru> <558C0A90.1040107@cs.ucla.edu> <558C1683.3030302@yandex.ru> <55BBC3B8.4080705@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438370664 28195 80.91.229.3 (31 Jul 2015 19:24:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:24:24 +0000 (UTC) To: Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 31 21:24:23 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLFuo-0004E9-MY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 21:24:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45770 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLFun-0007xW-Vp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:24:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58371) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLFuf-0007xK-GB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:24:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLFua-0001sA-A7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:24:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:38425) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLFua-0001rf-37 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:24:08 -0400 Original-Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so44010623wib.1 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:24:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i4S9cYjQrqFnA9FMlBV8B3cRaMYG99HUmvJKHiz2EB0=; b=o0hdYvSEriOvckqJdpd+TIpG5d8wQSG7TTqSDe9pFRe5EJcFRmCI9zP92sFSnj7yqk BIyA94L1HPGqrYi9a3aQ/oVrKXuI5uOWcAZhHVvG+khqDoVbvm1cy1b7f4FgztIpFjZO LPV3jFzg0g4/WmkMEEtNW4/eGYsLCOnQD63oxRD9LvZIbE3sgVfzwVGyqEYEh4h74kUM VVHea1+2oWZ0xBmxFsdLw7bm8BH0MTXnIa0/inGTR2qTI9SC43Hd5rhswF1TTQFnmHs+ tcmdKtOnEa8vQX/cFUnnHxcApqop38P3AywrqtBGSpg+Jd8aSeelqloH1r6f7TMPtYOa doqg== X-Received: by 10.180.231.40 with SMTP id td8mr9657626wic.9.1438370647502; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm5906938wix.19.2015.07.31.12.24.06 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:24:06 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/40.0 In-Reply-To: <55BBC3B8.4080705@cs.ucla.edu> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188241 Archived-At: On 07/31/2015 09:51 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > "Demand" is a pretty strong word. I did ask for better documentation in > Bug#20613. I realize it's not always easy to write good documentation. I thought I addressed that bug report more or less adequately. The piece of code you've quoted does not follow the idiomatic way font-lock-keywords should be used, but it plays by the documented rules, and simply adds compose-region as a side-effect. We can't document every way people might want to write a Lisp program. In any case, I thought we've moved away from the idea of using font-lock, to translating the buffer contents directly, in Lisp?