From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tooltips GC overhead Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 20:05:02 +0200 Message-ID: <55B915CE.7070803@gmx.at> References: <55B7796B.3070005@gmx.at> <55B87E3F.80708@gmx.at> <55B8E367.9020201@cs.ucla.edu> <55B8F3E9.5000707@gmx.at> <833806yld0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438193159 28553 80.91.229.3 (29 Jul 2015 18:05:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 29 20:05:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKVjg-00005e-Br for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 20:05:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36375 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKVjf-0004RD-6B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:05:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKVjE-0004Ps-NM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:05:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKVj9-0004D6-9T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:05:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:64421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKVj9-0004Cr-04; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:05:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [188.22.46.65] ([188.22.46.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MKYpv-1ZLslm0lkd-0020BX; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 20:05:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <833806yld0.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:KADEndYzqCrX/W6MT5uoCd2afRt3q0p52ZRbu4j6ndDCdJbM1AJ jZYaBzNdb7r9bl4Ikwd9w/S5yeDFy42l6gAa7LlSquvDe9ZXadpb4lVN6zbTUDoWIF3OHzr nlDZJ5ZNn+rTmOlX/F7ONh4I1XhE1wl+BqKaMWUAlOevqZ4cjXupA3fRDgxaomS4QDc+v30 7GhP4PZVYujY4S6I8DbSA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:BWAS2egvw5U=:3/G72N97tM2uDOVqaFoioS u8/ndwhULAIcD7zaGT+/22B806x+/mw0tgSUEM5D3SZKAvXwo4aEa9/7I/gji7vCmf1C7e7pI HJwzYgztKsoEZqiJqBsyWaYu4JL3OL5N1ay8re0WyfsjfdhAompLCn2R5bvblvrPXEwQBwPwR oUR1jZZr8UZAbYKCnLt8uy2g4W/okcJrYfPII5usupcxZcU5Y+sdLALvAUWnM0sBL7PRIO2br vNxIzfLdx7jrSDPcpaQjBE1aQ3lyMUtYiuQsVNSS1Xe2hY4mk4FbGnD+KvBR74LhtqVpy+Xpo 3ZjXT9Nb0P8UUj9SjL3Qnx3ol3HMQXUHeGpoW+h/F37kTYr9Q5WgrvUHGcAMyrhgZ2dCBGGqK q+r+R/sD5D1czNgpYWVd9ZDKdTWqC/JpFeIFGhjXiJ/q/gZv8XMDdt42N3PDgtyoOY8TiL9C0 /Y8/GVh/6tATBLX6URvJWyOwFkiV36bs6EcH1Iqs5cjBqvQhspTXkEN+mx20Evf8JkPT/dsmf +XHiyaVmpIlimzQwNVT31De25JBZFyQ34AQ02JcWKAXnXa8NZBMJzMHU2iwNmHl+FqL5bYUKo a2GKve2JOMPZ44wQWolqd7QYxKaBgHDHXhYqiIkNVjZCYbtzouBlzUViJtYxafq2iXKawWBwc uoUocY3MF6BVzZdy//SOOlIidX9jueaaGnIuIyY4wFpdCGh/uNbpejjultrGui8O6VtA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188172 Archived-At: >> Does that mean I have to recompile all elisp files? > > No, of course not. Otherwise, how would an Emacs tarball made on a > 64-bit platform work out of the box on a 32-bit platform? OK. I wouldn't have had the time anyway ;-) >> Because just doing >> that (on Windows 32) followed by `make' makes the number appear more or >> less the same and the percentages mostly negative. For example, I now >> get >> >> - tooltip-show 37,978,113 -9% >> - x-show-tip 17,048,133 -8% > > I think this is what Paul alluded to. But this was --with-wide-int. >> The numbers on my Debian 64 Gtk build are roughly the same (although the >> percentages show up correctly there). > > The --with-wide-int option is a no-op in 64-bit builds, AFAIK. I didn't configure --with-wide-int on that build. martin