From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Upcoming loss of usability of Emacs source files and Emacs. Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 18:44:47 +0300 Message-ID: <558AD06F.6080200@yandex.ru> References: <557F3C22.4060909@cs.ucla.edu> <5580D356.4050708@cs.ucla.edu> <87si9qonxb.fsf@gnu.org> <5581C29E.1030101@yandex.ru> <87r3p9fxm2.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k2v0fiji.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20150619090225.GA2743@acm.fritz.box> <87fv5kfrfa.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83twtzhi9g.fsf@gnu.org> <877fqvfvby.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83fv5jh8ls.fsf@gnu.org> <874mlzf71d.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <558945C2.2010203@yandex.ru> <5589E2DB.1060207@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1435160739 15866 80.91.229.3 (24 Jun 2015 15:45:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, acm@muc.de, stephen@xemacs.org, eliz@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 24 17:45:32 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7mrj-00053N-NX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:45:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51425 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7mrj-0006Uh-2w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:45:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7mra-0006Lb-CC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:45:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7mrZ-0008JA-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:45:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]:33179) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7mrU-0007hJ-Vh; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: by wiwl6 with SMTP id l6so99223903wiw.0; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 08:44:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n+D7ACJtpqb1XW1/rb0iROqExnJdkeiHVdO2DNoi9pA=; b=raogmkJw8KEDpBHPuPRpQ+iR6D6Tv7Gu5b/7cvcpXkaUJtG0pJzrpZlVRSxdG6q8sj dSswgkizRT5u2vwr4WYLBGH2ClEYGP32l6ZtoCsRnGRbz5FFfPQjLXHMD67kCIqJf69s kmm9INssZFinZTBzedhehMzBgBMfY8+H8ELiFazO21WIvcmg+rxLvQA5VfiuOXsitEq2 tGRF1ZTJmw2r+k0UAwCQGCXhR7IvqaifKIrbJxhzajaOXplSpxkpclOxL8mSRYMYnbdb 9u9JScY8uOGjF3Iw6U6sZYyHCBxAfRc3/9/c1LafOCnubmaY73FoGbxlXE8VudYcY8JB 48UA== X-Received: by 10.180.24.165 with SMTP id v5mr6041476wif.63.1435160689893; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 08:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bz2sm24901224wjc.25.2015.06.24.08.44.48 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Jun 2015 08:44:49 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187482 Archived-At: On 06/24/2015 05:55 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > Since they contain an unmatched backquote, a program to parse quotes > in doc strings might get confused by them. macroexp-let2 has several straight quotes later in the docstring. Why would we consider the first backtick unmatched?