From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Check for redundancy Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:29:25 +0200 Message-ID: <558A7875.4050905@easy-emacs.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1435138190 14479 80.91.229.3 (24 Jun 2015 09:29:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:29:50 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 24 11:29:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7h03-0006rv-NR for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:29:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49486 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7h03-0002yf-8Z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:29:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7gzt-0002yP-2X for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:29:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7gzo-0008AY-9V for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:29:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:50871) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7gzo-00088Y-0l for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:29:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([77.3.55.37]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFKXk-1ZLwaw1AGq-00EMCt for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:29:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:B2Jb+KmDhoXOfMRe3qj1T06j+z550S7psKaovJWydQoMw3yRXGT i56jlVesk4l6Wv9e+7XANyQ/gggZWk46SS7th6PBlHK9UoH92QwwiiygzT6+4qWe0MqdZFG GNKPHy42TOQNT04Sfgvwi5ZlIR+/bLkkv3Z+d5cAgqk9w8aRyPvuYvVZusOJUudQ2S/Y0Kt fFyCv4V3E8O8icGEUVPvw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:VNJ2ia/+uR4=:Ui0eC+LOGPLB6wq38y6ajK wHV4f/f7ObhUMKF+RQJSjeuOvcmqEvV6S1iOd0f/4BgtXK81QQ1BHQgO+ms3quYMaQ0wUXT9C DTUW5igJDUbqu+nqCTy1ESg9XZM56OD6BsSlhtnHUNCtFO03pYdaB1hSw6nv22VaDxtJ1D3BU ntHlXLp8oREdpbBFkjUHyB35b/46S+QFE5e/sw/4+RvYCXYpasVzHgAjk+dTEUkzLDzt/Ipm+ L8RXnbkayGKgVyKT6ayJDzM3UeTHvM49pfZpOQe5X4X/cpYMe4yOjpj0XcuWZ9S1btysReWk0 n/S8r7Hku6h9xHTVIGYIsKzaH9IB5Een5lQ9TlRFeMqHs3lEOvhEMjbernhpEIAoPNm/M1nzg o/0QzE/52be4dEwuLpVZixTNuv0OrW3RWTtxxDrRu+7cchx5rAzwLS8/SZM3E7dVoigBtU/YH lZuXElUto6j3MWi0tJNgZtXrPHBs4d6eaemoiqkws1CR78OKsQ048C/yPz5lMph3sZkUQG63t qYa1k/nTy2+9c6uMt2WDT339kFlw+K36c+YV/5IfuCsVUgZcyek8wQ4v6wQpV+mXUtlaHOiuY TkqicvCkF1KACg5gb9eRyN8X6BPjXzv5K8x/kpheG19WCqtZhpT32f3rjFvPlQYqj78+La2/9 RgcxLSu5G2SbWC9gSdwGBgYxPs4de9oWdFNVgdtuX6C9mVQ== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.10 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:105115 Archived-At: Hi, is there a check for redundancy in code? Byte-compile warnings seem not to cover this. Thanks, Andreas