From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20802: Segfault when showing non-GTK+ tooltip Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:37:20 +0200 Message-ID: <5582C990.5020009@gmx.at> References: <1434187118.10061.4.camel@gmx.de> <83381wq76d.fsf@gnu.org> <557C0526.5050607@gmx.at> <831thfri91.fsf@gnu.org> <557C2EF2.5030308@gmx.at> <83vberpv07.fsf@gnu.org> <557C3E1F.6030305@gmx.at> <83twubpt43.fsf@gnu.org> <557D5EE9.7070902@gmx.at> <83h9qapee0.fsf@gnu.org> <55813F99.8070801@gmx.at> <83bngemgqv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1434634720 6924 80.91.229.3 (18 Jun 2015 13:38:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tobias.getzner@gmx.de, 20802@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 18 15:38:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5a1J-0002SR-LW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:38:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52831 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5a1J-0005od-2F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:38:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5a1E-0005kL-DM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:38:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5a15-00073g-Rb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5a15-00073X-O2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5a14-0001zW-ON for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:38:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20802 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20802-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20802.14346346587595 (code B ref 20802); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20802) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2015 13:37:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50563 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5a0f-0001yO-SH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:37:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:58426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5a0b-0001y1-UC for 20802@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [91.113.1.189] ([91.113.1.189]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MTSrf-1ZWm4g2ZWh-00SNoL; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:37:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83bngemgqv.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:eh3boOanb0DmHgk73cffXuUe4tTdXhuxupFcKBRgJ7kY92O55dP BEYzflhzgnA48Z7sW9qzYT2mjnIFVaYC9dsIMxbdvogfJu5NUNci8MD+ki69ZA+O62CuARM oo+vwR3TPrTg8SwRSv5QZoVmo87HYHgUIyLF9tYYAWEPFdf+LyOGy/0+ZVkX8ZPYtFcL+G+ +xAOCTCam0sR1lD9pvzAg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Gnum6bDAjIg=:qo9mKVfXV35NCyeXi9Ir0V lohiwRg5kc6eAciB9MxgVIQ1eDk7wmegdZbnDrb3iq9ZzFCWLa+/DuspbC14MLMXJ1reEL+SI H9kHS6wXvxHZ/RH3St6UgeYL3ykXA5mDk6ndR1ZGeFLSW/bktzGeuqMnr/gFVjdciXEVUh81W wZgZzjYzsSn/Tp8P2BeYph+hQYQ9/qOHABIn4lbZpmDBLKM8OWjrqVao02aWrFGO+k3iDq/kL 0LhjmOG5hMCKofa+qFWYwMbYifknZtkdF+EAaFawec7PxquMVg13wLsnDKlMzV1jUJXC8i2NV 5SuVCgvStSeoR33VZiq1SD+B0PKp0PvaBdQq9XgBZ9KWCcGKw2eHUHkromSrGhm0aLpjtDYKy n7iSlEIjBda5b/ZPCccbuxW3Wc4wNly4+itn22S3R5ovl85L2Gou3M54u+8HgUujRqCCA4eec +vRgP/FfYuv8X6MpKgwY3xtW6K7Z4seEV0bqTF3bd4P4vRrlTd1SxsUm6vXZuvi2xV190MJEy TUQRqYVQrtaRhA8KU8fuHGHQ83znLPMBszRnBmt5+taiRJ+kWDqYPCkM49TVpZd55iTHeDrqQ ECwx64lTZBjk4AqQrpRi5KOL9DZyLzu2rV7AGPz1oyEi/QTPPkVOzMFCCtbm5G8EBy6Qq814G aYX/HgoxJEFh4e54ru9bgWAs2tH1lsuYu3gzFdAhN4yhFu0yNhMpLT2gypV7x90S4zII= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:104082 Archived-At: > Why can't we simply move the code that frees the image cache to > delete_terminal? There's only one image cache for each terminal, and > it's shared by all frames on that terminal, right? And we call > delete-terminal when we delete the last frame on the terminal, right? =E2=80=98delete-terminal=E2=80=99 can run into precisely the same problem= I described in my previous scenario. IMHO we have to give up the idea of using refcounts to tell whether a frame might still use some object - they are not up to this task. martin