From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35592: Use display-buffer-in-direction for completion-like windows Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 10:25:31 +0200 Message-ID: <557b5314-7d7a-5375-0829-1975393b1e7e@gmx.at> References: <87woj4r5xx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <6d8899a4-18be-56cb-d820-7906d7ed0ee9@gmx.at> <8736lq54wf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <52083e2f-6320-a39c-feda-352d414f4690@gmx.at> <87d0kswz0t.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <44dbff2a-8683-455e-84d7-e9202ef58056@gmx.at> <878svfjtke.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83woiyg9ek.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfzcbtue.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838svccsk0.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnonwstv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pnoeqo68.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="261734"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35592@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 20 10:26:21 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hSdcj-0015ux-7t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 May 2019 10:26:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59981 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hSdci-0000bo-2u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 May 2019 04:26:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hSdcZ-0000aT-A6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2019 04:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hSdcV-0004h3-Pw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2019 04:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hSdcQ-0004fQ-Oy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2019 04:26:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hSdcQ-0001Cj-G7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2019 04:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 08:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35592 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35592-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35592.15583407464591 (code B ref 35592); Mon, 20 May 2019 08:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35592) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 May 2019 08:25:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36031 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hSdc8-0001Bs-C9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2019 04:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:57053) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hSdc6-0001Be-8R for 35592@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2019 04:25:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1558340731; bh=O8R8HUMYCt5qaKf2BAqTHsBMSIhnQv/xKT4IA/dZxKk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=AbfoLSuVLXoHNPKXDSgjhMvoDknLeHlz97NV/Enmr66UsY5WpBxr2e1tu7kvGuQhA I0lvOTd70XrsCmr0081iFNuS6xliuntMQg5ndsMR3/0SH05ig+/OYjatmvz5qkamg8 WdmfkkFVDXVRtVJ8cVo8BbRQERmZCbngCnoa3iS4= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.143]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MLiCu-1hAyCZ02sa-00HbQ1; Mon, 20 May 2019 10:25:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pnoeqo68.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: de-DE X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:HEbRdl8z0mwlTkVrvlsCMPMZTKN360YWx8bwWPtA0A2VjYOLUHK y1Cwdvl7BpSG4LK+VGpebeEYmY+6Fs19MPvLjRojCrAHp/khZo/gS3jOmCruN2VqbBLDlXt m05Vs6CyIzM/dIiXSfeM69IW78/oOLpjDamThi1XmSsav5Zqa/kaJIXqhp8OvPYom/ayrt+ MHwSswePhX3XkAvLkwyDw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:fhwhLXLSS0o=:4gpk/5vpT6V0jgOWHOGFmi 5vGv4Z8wdIcbpcUWGgJCX7FYLTcQIqmHmv1YCVPLxRLwE5JIt91QXWuQLUYyUXlAQIIXLfGRr BmTm7Rf83P1p5jP3WF5X0wPZl675FDLRWbIbrg2f6s6wb1P8pcQPzU5WmBhMTPEXY6oWgbU3i WK7QJINqpTtS8bs7NWZ/Yy6BJ5t9iUMimi9nT0T0bzU5oFFkQD3XYvZXw0kAPyqGUEt6dt4es 5XLReFZWBrytsTkO6ChmzKv2pxhMvP8Jjop9bOTk1umgnTuMGqhYgX1ClTKdw6a7sQTdNC73u sshmeFV4lr8aZtgAW7gWh34OA745G0tMQEIXH45wT1b42ssmY4h/LM2MDBsAVkQ6qjslwEQYn /K56f1D8oWEHiqHA6XUpQrlXjt/1uMRK2+w/D8C2NYw1Qphy0Gd/G2CcuPZvP9ZyL9yBqNGf5 4SXi0FGJNmie5sMlP5AL26XdKifYM3xAjzn+8NPkb02FbGBFAOXbFZcxml0DSrVkylkvYmhQh X6wiXJ8p+wyVxzTx+xAJdK8K5DAh0f9Ohlpe1t4o8lFb7laxXbQNsIJLgabLBSQY8EA2hagA9 rGPKdCa6BRddFxcvdfpU99ygy6gJ3dZjLIggA4ZAbl9N1SpjcGe3P464wsRh7f9HX+CTcr12e JJsF7rfiXQoiKTNjeHRuu4g1oCM6NQgkgA4xbpoUzBZxdrAodFKTceX7AQGNaT7bxv68UhG20 HVCqvhD+oieiDymnoE2jgYQ0gdL/rT4RB31F/pA6naFxJxL1yTeNVgKIQjxJv0nK4rpxqGA+ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159576 Archived-At: > Do you mean that display-buffer--maybe-at-bottom should not be > obsoleted? I.e. just to replace the call to display-buffer-at-bottom > in it with display-buffer-in-direction and that's all? I think 'display-buffer-at-bottom' should be still available via 'display-buffer--action-function-custom-type' so I think we cannot make it obsolete. Also I didn't add 'display-buffer-in-direction' there because we should decide first on how to proceed with it. > Also I noticed your comments about rewriting display-buffer-at-bottom. > Do you mean just to replace its body with the call to > display-buffer-in-direction, or obsolete it altogether and > replace all its uses with display-buffer-in-direction? The former (it's a three liner). But maybe some work remains wrt action arguments like 'window-min-height', 'window-height' and friends. I doubt that you have already exhausted all possibilities. martin