From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Apropos commands and regexps Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 06:31:17 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <557-Mon20May2002063117+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <5xlmafzph6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021865759 26220 127.0.0.1 (20 May 2002 03:35:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 03:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 179dxn-0006on-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 05:35:59 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 179eBY-0002Qe-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 05:50:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179dy4-0006M5-00; Sun, 19 May 2002 23:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mirapoint.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.20]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 179duz-0005xw-00 for ; Sun, 19 May 2002 23:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by mirapoint.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id AEK17466; Mon, 20 May 2002 06:32:56 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-Reply-To: <5xlmafzph6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4154 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4154 > From: storm@cua.dk > Date: 20 May 2002 01:29:09 +0200 > > > An example with two words discussed here brought about 70 hits, which > > IMHO is too many. > > If those two words are find and file, there *are* 70 commands which > contains both words ... how do you suggest emacs should decide which of > those to show (if you insist that 70 is too many)? It should suggest to refine the search in some way.