From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: mark-sexp again Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:57:30 +0200 Message-ID: <556F07CA.1020001@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433339909 15424 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2015 13:58:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:58:29 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 03 15:58:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z09BM-0001Qv-UO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:58:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35725 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z09BM-0000vI-5i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:58:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51105) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z09As-0000Mg-7H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:57:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z09Ao-0008Oo-V1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:57:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:60002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z09Ao-0008OI-LY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([77.12.100.249]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LqlM2-1ZdLXO1kag-00eP0q for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:57:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:MmwHmEev+BlelDKfZa90PK6QodLf1JsjfCUKgIRJLK3C0scktyl I5zBnT+b7Gg3Dg5/yAIRC6PUyOreL6zaqjlrtuiKRDKr2S3mbmuBcVIjDyBEnvlM2oNVmcx /rw1jLI9rRf/xoZfvlbWWgEEognylCfeehCfSIzaTJyqnuwfzCcFF14cMMH9mJdR7pOl5+I e3fmbOFeRJxjlOk+JNoJw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:2zKfQXsyuGc=:sl4NAAlq+G3D+Mx/1SGry8 31bkFlbS0BEJLu3TwR9q4S4S3jPmL+qvgaJnp3WQAOxJLsuLa6S7ACrNQ74/JqKaqqNRMlPtZ t5m1XnTiGRRcIwT+wSxG2EbFchMku/DnMnoCEGjGs0CHRqG1iiM5WmiF3g+NgqSg6B7jSIQIP ga/57RyPbAjYvzRnUbcR+lXiYiImhOxW8ZjlFpZV27Zg8ZPz20s80bavTlTspQBcAWAw49UnD l6E/jxK/H6hlVK7EYoQhurs/y7guDAr7jXOFdjLgtXykytkv8VQzysokuIwumu2dcY+ga9pE0 75nS0r4UTxRJuz+3sko19egdqkOqmYgyojb2f4829c3nW2ZFgF+so9vYEwNT2zz7mxYTfZ9DF FxUn30PYbZmAAIPoWGRhf9IONGqETU9H9R0kkLoAlsH4XO+sJKni9d6AsQKXHJIrV7Nvw5HEz PP42k/6HWJ/ZahT1U1dcnr0WEmOOlDP9xrPM6wRV+xnxX0X9875uGFR2lO8D6VhHVMxMcuyK1 5hlVM74ufU8Pi78kOY5brc5Ez9aiE01Bv/5DWGyenbCjW4zfnvXXj2Kuy4S3KhKgZ/0vHLV5c kx2PuSzXcQweTqlx/a5JIzN9LygHSYsUC/d+/8neTBrFnr+IZRWgIhg6fFJR2fT3k//2pMt9f vi2/h4sD6rFJpEyUvt1sKM0qQtTf1fI13saRtuXzCKjO+8w== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.13 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186982 Archived-At: Hi, coming across an implemention `clojure-mark-string' - useful for all people not having an appropriate extension. Given what the hell is all implemented in Emacs, why can't commands around sexp take the string if within? Cheers, Andreas