From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files.
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 22:42:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556A12A2.8030002@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <831thxvr7d.fsf@gnu.org>
On 05/30/2015 09:46 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> You said "based on correctness". If the 2-entry alternative
> facilitates more correct operation, that's the alternative we should
> choose, no?
It adds a capability (to perform the search based on fully qualified
name), rather than improving correctness.
But again, it's a separate question. You don't have to persuade me on
that choice, but I'm inclined toward compatibility with Ex-Ctags.
>>> Then how will you find or complete on "foo" when the explicit tag is
>>> "XX::foo"?
>>
>> I'd like to repeat that the current choice is between having only
>> unqualified method names in explicit tags, or having both qualified and
>> unqualified method names (2 entries per line).
>>
>> Having only a qualified entry is not a situation we're going to handle.
>
> You elide too much of the previous context, and I cannot afford
> reading 2 or 3 previous messages to restore that (and please don't
> rely on my memory too much). So I no longer understand what we are
> talking about here.
Sorry, I don't know where to start clarifying. In the previous message
I've explained why your question, quoted above, doesn't make sense: the
TAGS file must have another entry, for the same line, where the explicit
tag is "foo". That one will be matched, not "XX::foo".
This discussion has grown quite long already. Francesco seems to agree
with my conclusions, so I'm going to make the change.
> Including the pattern (what you call "the implicit tag") in the
> completion table could serve as context for disambiguating otherwise
> similar tag names. But if you think it's unneeded, I'm not going to
> argue.
Here you're using a term that's not part of the usual completion table
terminology. Context? Apparently you mean annotation, which would be
possible (*), but using the pattern as annotation for the current
entry's tag name is not at all the same as including the implicit tag
name (derived from the pattern) in the completion table. Which means
adding it as a separate element. For simplicity, think of this
completion table as a list, especially now it's implemented as such.
(*) But not necessarily advisable, and would bring its own challenge WRT
implementation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-30 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-22 5:57 bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files Jan D.
2015-05-23 11:54 ` Jan Djärv
2015-05-23 12:04 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-23 12:15 ` Jan Djärv
2015-05-23 12:18 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-23 12:28 ` Jan Djärv
2015-05-23 12:39 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-23 13:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-23 13:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-23 14:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-23 15:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-25 15:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-25 21:17 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-26 2:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-26 10:16 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-26 15:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-26 19:00 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-26 19:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-26 21:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-28 11:54 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-28 12:59 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-26 23:56 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-27 14:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-27 15:28 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-27 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-27 15:54 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-27 16:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-27 23:50 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-28 2:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-28 10:22 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-28 14:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-28 15:32 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-28 16:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-29 0:09 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-29 6:48 ` Glenn Morris
2015-05-29 8:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-29 12:34 ` Francesco Potortì
2015-05-29 9:27 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-29 8:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-29 14:05 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-29 16:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-29 17:12 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-29 19:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-29 20:33 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-29 21:41 ` etags completion table (was: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files) Stefan Monnier
2015-05-29 23:58 ` etags completion table Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-30 4:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-30 11:50 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-31 0:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-29 18:28 ` bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-29 20:01 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-29 20:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-29 22:36 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-30 6:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-30 12:52 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-30 13:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-30 14:21 ` Francesco Potortì
2015-05-30 14:44 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-28 11:35 ` Francesco Potortì
2015-05-28 11:46 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-28 12:16 ` Francesco Potortì
2015-05-28 13:00 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-28 13:12 ` Francesco Potortì
2015-05-28 15:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-28 15:14 ` Francesco Potortì
2015-05-28 15:29 ` Francesco Potortì
2015-05-29 17:13 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-30 12:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-30 12:30 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-30 12:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-30 13:42 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-30 14:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-30 15:03 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-30 16:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-30 17:46 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-30 18:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-30 19:42 ` Dmitry Gutov [this message]
2015-11-26 3:23 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-26 15:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-26 16:12 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-26 16:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-27 3:54 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-03-19 18:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-30 17:01 ` Francesco Potortì
2015-05-30 18:13 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-30 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-30 19:35 ` Francesco Potortì
2015-05-30 20:04 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-30 22:35 ` Francesco Potortì
2015-05-31 0:34 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-31 21:46 ` bug#20629: Fwd: bug#20703: 24.4; Stack overflow in regexp matcher Francesco Potortì
2015-05-31 22:20 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-31 22:40 ` Francesco Potortì
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556A12A2.8030002@yandex.ru \
--to=dgutov@yandex.ru \
--cc=20629@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.