From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 20:46:37 +0300 Message-ID: <5569F77D.5070903@yandex.ru> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <83twv31jzg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> <83bnh7z8c5.fsf@gnu.org> <5564C2C7.5050909@yandex.ru> <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> <55650812.60909@yandex.ru> <83mw0muv5m.fsf@gnu.org> <5569AD7F.2000402@yandex.ru> <83iobautar.fsf@gnu.org> <5569BE61.7010200@yandex.ru> <83a8wmuog6.fsf@gnu.org> <5569D136.90802@yandex.ru> <837frquilf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433008041 18071 80.91.229.3 (30 May 2015 17:47:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 17:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 30 19:47:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yykqj-0001Qu-F2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 19:47:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40102 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yykqi-0004Fi-NQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48017) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yykqg-0004FF-6y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yykqc-0001BU-W7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yykqc-0001BP-SX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yykqc-0001Bq-FM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 17:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.14330080084553 (code B ref 20629); Sat, 30 May 2015 17:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2015 17:46:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YykqN-0001BN-WD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:46:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:38671) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YykqM-0001BA-8A for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:46:46 -0400 Original-Received: by wizo1 with SMTP id o1so58650781wiz.1 for <20629@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:46:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6su4lH8d7adkHIkqfdIRvYbuvJv/jxq4bpvlZirwwh8=; b=IZFbMPNoK2EwPSoliB0M269STfd3b+/5Weh4jKtLzLnCkWpdyDB/tHYYnVPilTpQ56 g780gcEe3oQhSwNQUx3jm4uvS4Zp0R1k8Rx5QHnjjaqn9UF6Q6gn7p6KNt8oXjTpC95c Tfrg+TvOVuV1l9l6mPAvB7XuMZWlh7szG6q1KsT6FnNVMmLx0DvVxX0To/HzLjHN5GZ6 lEp3zsrtgS+i84KmJIxKXUb/sPRpmGoUNh9RPviIDu/zf4PNfUU4A8jXiE5xyyU3ygfS nP4r2vGmQLGl5peO9Aaj0UeemdfQ4wZtpEwVEkgb6VVvOXXyfMi5LX9tGWOricsozxGg wW4g== X-Received: by 10.180.87.105 with SMTP id w9mr6296890wiz.32.1433008000557; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm13675952wjq.12.2015.05.30.10.46.39 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 30 May 2015 10:46:40 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 In-Reply-To: <837frquilf.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103378 Archived-At: On 05/30/2015 07:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Won't TAGS file with 2 entries for such symbols facilitate more > correct operation, both from xref-find-definitions and completion? I suppose. But that's a separate decision, whether to make it the default. > Then how will you find or complete on "foo" when the explicit tag is > "XX::foo"? I'd like to repeat that the current choice is between having only unqualified method names in explicit tags, or having both qualified and unqualified method names (2 entries per line). Having only a qualified entry is not a situation we're going to handle.