From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 17:44:25 +0300 Message-ID: <5569CCC9.6040101@yandex.ru> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <83twv31jzg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> <83bnh7z8c5.fsf@gnu.org> <5564C2C7.5050909@yandex.ru> <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> <55650812.60909@yandex.ru> <831ti2yu1a.fsf@gnu.org> <5565E28A.5040507@yandex.ru> <83wpzuxbtd.fsf@gnu.org> <5565E8AB.5020107@yandex.ru> <83r3q2xa3q.fsf@gnu.org> <5566583F.7020503@yandex.ru> <83h9qxxvo4.fsf@gnu.org> <5566EC49.8010907@yandex.ru> <837frsycly.fsf@gnu.org> <5567351E.7020006@yandex.ru> <83zj4owthp.fsf@gnu.org> <5567AE52.1000600@yandex.ru> <83fv6fx0nk.fsf@gnu.org> <55687241.5030200@yandex.ru> <83617bw84o.fsf@gnu.org> <5568C589.5000405@yandex.ru> <834mmvw28j.fsf@gnu.org> <5568EA08.9070401@yandex.ru> <831thywo8q.fsf@gnu.org> <5569B283.1080706@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432997127 12921 80.91.229.3 (30 May 2015 14:45:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 14:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 30 16:45:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyi0f-0002Bw-1L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 16:45:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39644 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyi0e-0003am-Av for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53561) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyi0a-0003ZX-P1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:45:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyi0V-0004HZ-LM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51903) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyi0V-0004HO-IQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyi0V-0005OT-Bz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:45:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 14:45:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.143299707620680 (code B ref 20629); Sat, 30 May 2015 14:45:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2015 14:44:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33645 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyi04-0005NU-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:44:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:33969) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyi01-0005NG-T4 for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:44:34 -0400 Original-Received: by wgv5 with SMTP id 5so83029440wgv.1 for <20629@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 30 May 2015 07:44:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I00sPRRqfP5QD7APehiWbmdx8aPZziH58jBYfBKGOyY=; b=BIvAJtb6LqngnhmsmQU05tB+dAftsfGl4nv6ajmXbKX3GgTyQKmyom0caZLd1avXU7 s8ypxCx6tBJL/sR/h6BsHnJps+/A0mVoIe80dm3LeIdITn4QTer1/1x9BvcZIL0Rtn1B dQIZA5ncBsZEY8bttd/0auAV1eAq9UUcqNXkrM8Sppy06IpRvMst2P9rnfMl6+jFBUAh z5c9TDsE2DVd4BBohBPVOiCT2cOf6DBXVgIAeJTF+qdfSOmtpMl6ImotCXJBba6qkRe5 8MW4YMBSTZLXhBQfaAiPZqnMfAHAJYBFvKSL27N+KTlOnVFcd2foylCIgWvPhUvej4dv hflw== X-Received: by 10.194.177.230 with SMTP id ct6mr7166158wjc.31.1432997068136; Sat, 30 May 2015 07:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gj7sm7853675wib.4.2015.05.30.07.44.27 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 30 May 2015 07:44:27 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103369 Archived-At: On 05/30/2015 05:21 PM, Francesco Potort́ wrote: > Ex-ctags > generates new-style ctags tags and can recurs directories, both of which > would be easy to implement in Etags. It seems the users interested in this feature go on to simply use 'ctags -e'. I know I did, a while ago. > When I compared them, more than ten years ago, the quality of generated > tags were comparable. I don't know if things have changed in the > meantime, but I don't think that they have changed a lot. The code of > Ex-ctags is much more structured and, at a first sight, readable. > However, I have never tried to go deeply into it, so I don't know if, in > fact, it is really easier to manage. Ex-ctags supports 41 language (by the last count at http://ctags.sourceforge.net/languages.html, maybe more now), etags supports 26. The version at https://github.com/fishman/ctags also supports delegation to external parsers (see the --xcmd argument and https://github.com/fishman/ctags/blob/master/docs/xcmd.rst). > So "merging" would mean, in fact, to have the communities managing them > agree on one of them and improve it so that it becomes a superset of the > other, then officielly declare the other one as deprecated. Indeed.