From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 15:30:55 +0300 Message-ID: <5569AD7F.2000402@yandex.ru> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <83twv31jzg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> <83bnh7z8c5.fsf@gnu.org> <5564C2C7.5050909@yandex.ru> <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> <55650812.60909@yandex.ru> <83mw0muv5m.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432989143 24004 80.91.229.3 (30 May 2015 12:32:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 12:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 30 14:32:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyfvt-0004Mf-RK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 14:32:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyfvs-0001uV-MN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 08:32:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyfvq-0001re-51 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 08:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyfvn-0005o8-0I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 08:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51213) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyfvm-0005o2-Tw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 08:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyfvm-00028F-JY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 08:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 12:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.14329890698107 (code B ref 20629); Sat, 30 May 2015 12:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2015 12:31:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32955 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyfuu-00026g-6W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 08:31:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:33985) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyfuq-000269-VR for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 08:31:05 -0400 Original-Received: by wibut5 with SMTP id ut5so2956492wib.1 for <20629@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 30 May 2015 05:30:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3j1Mdib74/zRIbvRtZcxjLTqgvfEL3IzqXuGhr0DCrY=; b=WmY5lGcJKlwPOatO7ZtGEMQlJTcS9V79mTTGNMiFrlJBYq63MH1GJi2igXr1N1tYHl +eQTJ16o1yM8le/Mqo1/bTp+4GiEOgCr5nOE+d3nPtc87BvVLJfAVIM340slrls92Ss5 PGDC/YEnWSWYekFmF/OB5ARdFDJsePpcpASuyRLm8gen0KUaTxc1b0VURSeq1d8Hu/Ug xSZwFdZtlwB1rFmr2L85Kf4PArImPG7QQBD1XM71/GckcUBQol8tn12FN+Yz0wjQU2/2 SKk/uipCD7BUbmEbku6O+m1OnxQfVTOnIUIOpeTz2SLSK543wvrT3oLVjwyAXDM3O444 BmTA== X-Received: by 10.194.189.80 with SMTP id gg16mr24619210wjc.9.1432989059194; Sat, 30 May 2015 05:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id di9sm7391332wib.16.2015.05.30.05.30.57 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 30 May 2015 05:30:58 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 In-Reply-To: <83mw0muv5m.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103357 Archived-At: On 05/30/2015 03:06 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I tried it, and I think the completion display is better now. Better how? > Should I install the change for emitting 2 lines in TAGS, for both > unqualified and qualified tag names? Err, these changes are orthogonal, if not to say complete opposites. If there are two lines in TAGS for each item, no change to etags-tags-completion-table should be necessary. I was rather thinking to make tag-implicit-name-match-p more strict, so it doesn't match if the explicit tag name is present on that line.