From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 01:36:56 +0300 Message-ID: <5568EA08.9070401@yandex.ru> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <83twv31jzg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> <83bnh7z8c5.fsf@gnu.org> <5564C2C7.5050909@yandex.ru> <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> <55650812.60909@yandex.ru> <831ti2yu1a.fsf@gnu.org> <5565E28A.5040507@yandex.ru> <83wpzuxbtd.fsf@gnu.org> <5565E8AB.5020107@yandex.ru> <83r3q2xa3q.fsf@gnu.org> <5566583F.7020503@yandex.ru> <83h9qxxvo4.fsf@gnu.org> <5566EC49.8010907@yandex.ru> <837frsycly.fsf@gnu.org> <5567351E.7020006@yandex.ru> <83zj4owthp.fsf@gnu.org> <5567AE52.1000600@yandex.ru> <83fv6fx0nk.fsf@gnu.org> <55687241.5030200@yandex.ru> <83617bw84o.fsf@gnu.org> <5568C589.5000405@yandex.ru> <834mmvw28j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432939103 31072 80.91.229.3 (29 May 2015 22:38:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 22:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 30 00:38:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YySuo-0004zN-Px for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 00:38:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37880 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YySuo-0005Lo-2d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 18:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YySul-0005Jd-B5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 18:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YySuh-00055u-B3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 18:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YySuh-00055q-7T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 18:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YySug-0004b9-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 18:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 22:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.143293902917610 (code B ref 20629); Fri, 29 May 2015 22:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2015 22:37:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60912 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YySto-0004Zx-Nj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 18:37:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:37603) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyStl-0004ZR-TL for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 18:37:06 -0400 Original-Received: by wifw1 with SMTP id w1so40533626wif.0 for <20629@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 29 May 2015 15:37:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zm7t80b9vTzMIArntl2lNOAE/e+C+D/UGpPqr5cq3xs=; b=GPgvBptFvXShfkGipCVA0kR1t7it56QE4MIxgphzDUiSvbF02GYWgrWqEjtGI0dFr3 IIQPDe1dNpvm/jJpJQLK0AJDjzJYULtNLXe+9maPhjYqSepl8ENTmubbjDDBqLMRchbz 6KDpHldXyyh0aL5zE65cZTvW3DW5XdUq7bMYBRNVTFGJ6t85VCc9aJLfpz7zMDOwYHxR Zs4pXzGnES2Gc5jifVBuFyMNNCZymVgCe97PQSUuz13Q/7WXOpFMB9D4bw+ZcLzf5sxc /pgSGA+omwUJ2oEmpEPpBvMx74Eir+tj/MTkYaYZO93yUdI6eqEWKO9ArCvMoQPdnCsr FKEw== X-Received: by 10.180.74.132 with SMTP id t4mr10948651wiv.55.1432939020123; Fri, 29 May 2015 15:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c3sm3290202wja.3.2015.05.29.15.36.58 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 May 2015 15:36:59 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 In-Reply-To: <834mmvw28j.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103335 Archived-At: On 05/29/2015 11:35 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > xref expects more accurate results, because it shows them all at once, > instead of one by one, in some order that assures the users will only > ever see the few first ones. So yes, I'd say the switch to xref puts > a different kind of pressure on what etags/ctags does. It does exert some pressure, but mostly to ensure that when a user searches for a "symbol" that they see in a buffer, it should have an explicit or an implicit tag match. Whether qualified tag names are included in the completion, and whether one can search for a qualified tag name reliably, that hasn't changed between find-tag and xref-find-definitions. > foo::bar::baz is standard C++, AFAIK, so the ambiguity is already > known to C++ programmers. I'm not disputing that.