From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 13:16:15 +0300 Message-ID: <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <83twv31jzg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432635446 31724 80.91.229.3 (26 May 2015 10:17:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 10:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 26 12:17:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YxBv3-0001lM-Sc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 12:17:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46905 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxBv2-0001Gw-Va for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 06:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxBv0-0001Gr-1q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 06:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxBuw-00063t-Rc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 06:17:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxBuw-00063c-OU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 06:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YxBuw-0001Jw-1i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 06:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 10:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.14326353865029 (code B ref 20629); Tue, 26 May 2015 10:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2015 10:16:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56224 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YxBuM-0001J2-6w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 06:16:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:35183) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YxBuJ-0001Io-VU for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 06:16:24 -0400 Original-Received: by wgme6 with SMTP id e6so24040321wgm.2 for <20629@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 03:16:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DAUSh7VbGU6j8l+wXtriJcAAm+v1GncdmFnEFg7s64I=; b=kJ+VdrDOc+uEbZwyFeeaI0oRJOwXA8jSQhsnN1QolGuE+hiBA5IBHY63MSj7quAEN0 sHhPQk+kLV1DDqdQFtLyTvwxRL/HjF4PxRpws6Z7E4sqHLMm8YKYAvq2jteYrXq5g9gU 419dwYL+sD7m8atHx0HavCMP+6PCGyRgHhU6puKHMMSgAMKbRErsOiNOzMJ8ZKSqeVKD YMJR25yK7slsb8WTP3CTE53SwA4M6hulqmwMFWnGurmwy39PiWlSsfVX0H3pCkbAYtQr eVXsGW8yhC6b5YYcTYoEeOwaAxBfmJAU4fsdn4uWkOCKTc+EWTvZ8i3R/u0xmW809+a7 AONg== X-Received: by 10.194.61.180 with SMTP id q20mr28752442wjr.80.1432635378223; Tue, 26 May 2015 03:16:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ng5sm16085925wic.24.2015.05.26.03.16.17 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 May 2015 03:16:18 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 In-Reply-To: <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103179 Archived-At: On 05/26/2015 05:35 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Does any other version of ctags produce> better results with the same structure of TAGS? No, 'ctags -e' gives pretty much the same output that 'etags' does now. So it's definitely acceptable. > Given the structure of TAGS and the way xref picks up the symbol at > point, what else can we do? Can you suggest how this could work > better even in principle? I'm not sure. One direction would be to add `:' to NONAM, so that a method name would implicitly match a qualified tag as well. Not sure if it will be a problem in some languages (but in, say, Elisp `:' can be a part of an identifier). Another - to make etags-tags-completion-table include both the pattern and the explicit tagname in the returned obarray.