From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20628: 25.0.50; Incorrect line height for some fonts Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 04:20:22 -0400 Message-ID: <556189C6.5070103@live.com> References: <555E9C2E.8040008@live.com> <83617l5aox.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp5s2a77.fsf@gmail.com> <83wq004x2w.fsf@gnu.org> <83twv44vd3.fsf@gnu.org> <87egm87ny6.fsf@gmail.com> <83oalc4syu.fsf@gnu.org> <87617k7m5u.fsf@gmail.com> <83mw0w4seb.fsf@gnu.org> <87zj4w66ds.fsf@gmail.com> <83lhgg4qhf.fsf@gnu.org> <87iobk64e6.fsf@gmail.com> <83h9r44o63.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp5sy4vu.fsf@gmail.com> <83egm84mj3.fsf@gnu.org> <87617k6127.fsf@gmail.com> <83d21s4lpx.fsf@gnu.org> <87twv44lnc.fsf@gmail.com> <83bnhc4gx4.fsf@gnu.org> <555F7D7C.8070503@live.com> <831ti84d8u.fsf@gnu.org> <555F90A1.9080001@live.com> <83iobj3gzb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432455686 6264 80.91.229.3 (24 May 2015 08:21:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 08:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ohwoeowho@gmail.com, 20628@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 24 10:21:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YwR9n-0000KV-5j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 10:21:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39362 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwR9m-00048x-29 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 04:21:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33746) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwR9f-00048p-UP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 04:21:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwR9b-0007Fv-UF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 04:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwR9b-0007Fp-Qc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 04:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YwR9b-0005jU-CH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 04:21:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 08:21:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20628 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20628-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20628.143245564421973 (code B ref 20628); Sun, 24 May 2015 08:21:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20628) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2015 08:20:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YwR9D-0005iE-8r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 04:20:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:62084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YwR96-0005hv-I9 for 20628@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 04:20:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.189.125.138] ([18.189.125.138]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LakfY-1ZOvHF0J5c-00kQWl; Sun, 24 May 2015 10:20:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: <83iobj3gzb.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:YDNUE6LtNIuk+qGK5esJojbmsPlOvg5lTVW2TQzzI1s8SVz2BM6 PBnSnQtTb9XWMV6SNhPgj6YvFcfxEtZYrvcKLZ2vrzQRDWGbDa1a8Dbe5nStnDjxOPiDVLP WnDB/QI7ipo/pl2eMboh1swTDavUZfSbke+FYyaX8kfH/Hgn2q+f45RhdssohdTA6bNRx9j xsTzzGnucRtqytblLsSGg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103120 Archived-At: On 05/23/2015 03:12 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 16:25:05 -0400 >> From: Clément Pit--Claudel >> >> CC: ohwoeowho@gmail.com, 20628@debbugs.gnu.org >> >>> Couldn't those package developers recommend fontset settings, of even >>> include ready-to-use .emacs snippets as part of the package? >> >> Indeed. In fact, that's what I already do with company-coq ( https://github.com/cpitclaudel/company-coq/#troubleshooting ). However, people are still reporting this as a bug. >> >> I am not sure what I can do as a package developer to make it work "out of the box". An option to override the line height would be helpful, since I could do it at the package level; advanced users could then tweak things further (eg. by installing better fonts), but basic users would still benefit from decent defaults. > > How about setting the list of fonts to be ignored (assuming Emacs > acquires such a capability) -- would that be useful for packages? Maybe. The problem is that if a good font is not installed yet, ignoring Latin Modern Math means replacing huge lines with square boxes. I'm not sure which one is best. Ignoring Latin Modern Math may be better because fixing the square boxes then only requires installing a new font (while fixing the line heights requires installing a new font /and/ setting up fontsets in Emacs). But ignoring Latin Modern Math is also more confusing (the symbols will display fine in user's web browsers, but not in Emacs). The unearthing of `face-ignored-fonts' likely makes this an easy change; do you have an opinion either way?