From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 15:39:59 +0300 Message-ID: <5560751F.5090402@yandex.ru> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <5560702D.1030303@yandex.ru> <5560727E.7000401@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432384893 19130 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2015 12:41:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:41:33 +0000 (UTC) To: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= , 20629-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 23 14:41:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8js-0005nb-Rt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:41:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37626 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8js-0002WG-0e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:41:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8jk-0002Vs-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:41:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8jg-0003RS-3H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43537) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8jf-0003RI-Vb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8jf-0000Wp-9x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:41:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:41:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D20629.14323848231972 (code D ref 20629); Sat, 23 May 2015 12:41:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2015 12:40:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53512 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8iw-0000Vf-8R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:40:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:35979) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8io-0000VH-NO for 20629-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:40:15 -0400 Original-Received: by wgbgq6 with SMTP id gq6so38927054wgb.3 for <20629-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:40:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lgep5uBP3zfRzRF2GIlu7yN0Zt3qSEBdGz4Pi3A06l0=; b=EebDjVCIIntrsrH2A1dt/y0OvDKpQnG8X27mg0b9MSmqBXVcVn7i4W1qQWzBVWjFlG EaSxIzK4Jrw5dzKpeJVqKy1bs1wHnt7TctHeqzNcD9gc04WiCnDpXbQtGS6j8xkwVew0 TUaVOTl1wwhFOzPydHJHlgYnHpGGIXkOuqbezmZbDFDcj2OTNGM7vGuAA5Ebsu+kziZI qDc0A0xdXlrXcNsXxsbSIUajBhuMVS4VTs7mNcTbixNvNVfsCx0FVPyjI31yNPgUhTWG kUvj+VsuE3H7qI1JP6R1UOerZwi5TtslrnJZU6KyDqBRMcDCcGExdLJbP2nFio1roRUb xRWw== X-Received: by 10.180.90.73 with SMTP id bu9mr15921239wib.88.1432384804811; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm7145173wjr.48.2015.05.23.05.40.03 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 23 May 2015 05:40:04 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 In-Reply-To: <5560727E.7000401@swipnet.se> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103101 Archived-At: On 05/23/2015 03:28 PM, Jan Djärv wrote: > It has an example of how etags has behaved since forever. Thats nothing > new. Being decades-old doesn't mean it's not a bug. > Perhaps, but until someone does, there is no need to break things that > work. Someone already has: using 'ctags -e' (version 5.9~svn20110310, as distributed by Ubuntu), your scenario works even when tag-symbol-match-p is not in etags-xref-find-definitions-tag-order. Here's its output: x.cc,96 class XXXX1,0 XX::foo()foo9,58 XX::bar()bar15,92 main(int argc, char *argv[])main21,122 And here's etags' output: x.cc,55 class XX1,0 XX::foo(9,58 XX::bar(15,92 main(21,122