From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 14:28:46 +0200 Message-ID: <5560727E.7000401@swipnet.se> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <5560702D.1030303@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432384231 9476 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2015 12:30:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:30:31 +0000 (UTC) To: Dmitry Gutov , 20629-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 23 14:30:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8ZH-0008T7-RC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:30:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37609 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8ZH-0000Tg-0D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:30:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8Z9-0000TR-V4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:30:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8Z5-0003Rt-LA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8Z5-0003Qs-Ho for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8Z4-0000GX-AH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:30:06 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:30:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D20629.1432384144921 (code D ref 20629); Sat, 23 May 2015 12:30:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2015 12:29:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53508 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8Xz-0000ER-S3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailfe05.swip.net ([212.247.154.129]:48940 helo=swip.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8Xt-0000EA-SK for 20629-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:28:58 -0400 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Original-Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 594057163; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:28:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 In-Reply-To: <5560702D.1030303@yandex.ru> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103100 Archived-At: Den 2015-05-23 14:18, Dmitry Gutov skrev: > On 05/23/2015 03:15 PM, Jan Djärv wrote: > >> There is just theoretical ramblings about precision without any bug or >> user visible impact that the change solves. Definitly not anything that >> motivates breaking C++ support. >> I reverted it. > > Theoretical? It's got an easy practical example. It has an example of how etags has behaved since forever. Thats nothing new. > > Someone should look into making etags C++ support work with the notions of > explicit and implicit tags. As it is, the indexer is broken, judging by your > experience. Perhaps, but until someone does, there is no need to break things that work. Jan D.