From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20628: 25.0.50; Incorrect line height for some fonts Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:05:25 -0400 Message-ID: <555F7DF5.50400@live.com> References: <555E9C2E.8040008@live.com> <87pp5s2a77.fsf@gmail.com> <83wq004x2w.fsf@gnu.org> <83twv44vd3.fsf@gnu.org> <87egm87ny6.fsf@gmail.com> <83oalc4syu.fsf@gnu.org> <87617k7m5u.fsf@gmail.com> <83mw0w4seb.fsf@gnu.org> <87zj4w66ds.fsf@gmail.com> <83lhgg4qhf.fsf@gnu.org> <87iobk64e6.fsf@gmail.com> <83h9r44o63.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp5sy4vu.fsf@gmail.com> <83egm84mj3.fsf@gnu.org> <87617k6127.fsf@gmail.com> <83d21s4lpx.fsf@gnu.org> <87twv44lnc.fsf@gmail.com> <87egm84kp2.fsf@gmail.com> <83a8ww4grx.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhggmq6u.fsf@gmail.com> <838ucg4fnm.fsf@gnu.org> <87egm8moku.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432321591 15149 80.91.229.3 (22 May 2015 19:06:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20628@debbugs.gnu.org To: Oleh Krehel , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 22 21:06:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YvsGv-0000OF-GU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 21:06:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35377 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvsGu-0003CA-Mj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvsGm-0003C3-1u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvsGg-0004Wj-U7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvsGg-0004Wd-Qq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YvsGg-00024k-EE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20628 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20628-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20628.14323215387941 (code B ref 20628); Fri, 22 May 2015 19:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20628) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 May 2015 19:05:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53179 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YvsGG-000240-Pb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:05:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:58504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YvsGE-00023m-54 for 20628@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 15:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [128.30.9.212] ([128.30.9.212]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mhl9H-1YYxuu22Hz-00Mvv4; Fri, 22 May 2015 21:05:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: <87egm8moku.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:wUtsW+IFYQBdgQEAxP/iYqKg2OdMqZhZYxAXT0SJjORpeI5AQYS RIdtSvZ6KCxHAZnmc87N5H76JJ5lV+tZabR/NKHoZRg13K4oLPM6S+ETvVSyjrVRsDw7hO8 OEkP9VfD3tgm7jXpXU3YhlBiqjn3HStr05TbRNt1892dU/6Ff6S3yanvEmlFMW5GCZ+xk/X g+tJ8D4OaFQ5whbviy7tw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103058 Archived-At: On 05/22/2015 02:53 PM, Oleh Krehel wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> Isn't it much easier (and cleaner) to set up Emacs to not use that >> font for these characters? There are quite a few good fonts out there >> that support these symbols without such huge ascent/descent values, >> just use them instead. > > It may be, but I've noticed this problem a month ago with no idea how to > fix it. And even now, I still have to research some more: find a good > font and write down the needed setting. Most users won't go to such > lengths to fix a visual bug, they'll just be silently annoyed and > unhappy. I agree with this statement. For the record, the correct invocation is (set-fontset-font fontset 'unicode (font-spec :name "Symbola") nil 'append) and Symbola is in package ttf-ancient-fonts in Debian. Clément.