From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: cg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dumped_data_commit: memory exhausted Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:39:56 +0800 Message-ID: <555AB08C.5030306@gmail.com> References: <5559877E.9010602@gmx.at> <837fs6ezn4.fsf@gnu.org> <555A04F6.7030708@gmail.com> <83vbfpeugu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: chengang31@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432006854 17522 80.91.229.3 (19 May 2015 03:40:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 03:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 19 05:40:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YuYOb-0007yy-Js for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 May 2015 05:40:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43767 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuYOa-00041d-NS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 23:40:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuYO8-0003zG-KX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 23:40:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuYO5-0002Nv-Ek for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 23:40:16 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuYO5-0002No-8C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 23:40:13 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YuYO1-0007sB-Vd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2015 05:40:10 +0200 Original-Received: from 217.140.104.200 ([217.140.104.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 05:40:09 +0200 Original-Received: from chengang31 by 217.140.104.200 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 05:40:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.140.104.200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 In-Reply-To: <83vbfpeugu.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186611 Archived-At: On 5/19/2015 12:11 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Arbitrary, indeed. The value needs to be as small as possible, > because that's memory wasted in the dumped Emacs (because > bootstrap-emacs needs significantly more space in that array). So I'd > appreciate if you or someone else could come up with a smaller > increment. E.g., does 19 instead of 18 work? > I have just tried 19 and it works. -- cg