From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20445: excessive redisplay / echo area resizing during byte-compilation Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 12:41:51 +0200 Message-ID: <5543586F.5010606@gmx.at> References: <7cfv7lxnpr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83sibkuvze.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3r3szgt.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430477006 17228 80.91.229.3 (1 May 2015 10:43:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 10:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20445@debbugs.gnu.org To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 01 12:43:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PZ-0005Oq-Dw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 12:43:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53507 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PY-0008Bp-IT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:43:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PT-0008Bb-L0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PO-00061L-EL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PO-000617-8f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8PN-00061X-QI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 10:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20445 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20445-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20445.143047692623075 (code B ref 20445); Fri, 01 May 2015 10:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2015 10:42:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58125 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8OT-000607-CS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:42:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:56997) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo8OR-0005zN-2A for 20445@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 06:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [88.117.112.225] ([88.117.112.225]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRoyH-1YhDY40KPB-00Swvf; Fri, 01 May 2015 12:41:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:WN48+MTN2w/IvPKxUtqJstZy0t0KftvPMIhmEmkv7E3uc3chHBj uph2Tp7yygREpLVfXO6QKWjhhzdQV44yXhDq6iekFuVdBSqhQgehIMEcHZCr9ohpmza2dk8 WqiZDADXjTbGi43VCKfu1BQmmXOUNv9Ip39GzzD7s6LuNndbFBoLYUPso18FPzg0tieCEjJ hTrKhY1BclfPjC3/AY2Pw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:102321 Archived-At: > I can revert that commit completely if people prefer. Then everything > should go back to what it was (and package.el will still be able to > silence the compiler on its own). I think this would be better, yes. martin