From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: UI inconveniences with M-. Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:26:18 +0300 Message-ID: <5541143A.1050307@yandex.ru> References: <83zja6b3tc.fsf@gnu.org> <54A24079.4020902@yandex.ru> <54A2FF47.6010207@yandex.ru> <54A86135.7080004@yandex.ru> <54A90002.7080009@gmx.at> <54A9C3FB.7000602@yandex.ru> <54AA3881.3080304@gmx.at> <54ABBB47.7010603@yandex.ru> <837fszx7iy.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3r5wqwv.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2wxwexb.fsf@gnu.org> <83fv7kwbow.fsf@gnu.org> <837fsvuefq.fsf@gnu.org> <5540FF87.3000903@yandex.ru> <83k2wuucwk.fsf@gnu.org> <554105FF.3090900@yandex.ru> <83h9ryub9v.fsf@gnu.org> <55410F7F.8080509@yandex.ru> <83egn2ua7o.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430328423 4377 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2015 17:27:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 29 19:27:00 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YnVlD-0004h3-CN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:26:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40281 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnVlC-00058q-Fd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:26:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnVkz-00055x-6b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:26:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnVkt-00029F-7V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:26:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]:33014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnVkt-000231-0N; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:26:39 -0400 Original-Received: by wgin8 with SMTP id n8so36054885wgi.0; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8ki/EzewIi4HYEZNJZrc0DG3UqKtN5kBF0QYsa1FnwI=; b=HWUeTZRfNL/RYLrQI9i71v8EaEIRzCn2+J28GI2RbKd80urFQUXfxwWb1QRaaAoi5P pJGa/ZcS2LjPRywJk26ofR72LFPKkhvngTyDcWejwp1JSwYQQasycCxj0RxW6F9bZQN/ EI085PRZvub8UWLVqKa5VAVembHptQptY41fZLkAkXxRTvNKa5SqBnV6IIulgjrTQ6uT k2+K30pL9kK20wr9P+sa6zz32+dbCCnR3XbSIzGW8xWVd10EpkvAC53rjz1vwCT1Rccb AcFDyI6hIQFW/4xsqFSBIT+GdvmiqgOBQQnE8SoUob88u//Mw1swSvRh3bGte2mTH7nU iIqA== X-Received: by 10.180.211.102 with SMTP id nb6mr7837118wic.32.1430328380407; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm124781wix.0.2015.04.29.10.26.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT) user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 in-reply-to: <83egn2ua7o.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186036 Archived-At: On 04/29/2015 08:15 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Where does this say that the problems need to be fixed in the UI? In "this bug report is ... about the UI". > I'm sorry that I confused you, and glad that we have that sorted out > now. Ok, thanks. > You could fool me. Was that a wrong idiom? I only meant to state that "fixing the UI" is more or less impossible.