From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should Emacs define push-tag-mark? Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:32:11 +0300 Message-ID: <5540CF4B.4030507@yandex.ru> References: <87618gkrxx.fsf@gmail.com> <55400825.2050301@yandex.ru> <874mnziapg.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430310773 6926 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2015 12:32:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Oleh Krehel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 29 14:32:38 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YnRAK-0006ta-Ap for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:32:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38587 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnRAJ-00039T-M9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:32:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnRAE-0002zp-II for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:32:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnRAB-0004Pm-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:32:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:34535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnRAA-0004L1-SR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:32:27 -0400 Original-Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so130034360wic.1 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:32:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y9s2jHsk4UvXHcESNlPbjMQNdIBELocA1oOtUzLdhjE=; b=JJA25DPvS2qwvdQpvG6HTZFprvim1dk4OgEPlfnKOSGijHXBfbbDNMviYfmk2tz0qx WVSPCV7t+70acGmPeJV2Ui1Z2b5DqsxzcYODjgOL1Pfksgv9uSdp1TM8RCliDm6H33OG Vc63U70PWuboSSECGwZ5a8twr0YQYpmBxestfYrYw9RkdCxi0GqSqkNFJYlH6YeuiN8R HQ0y9p2f3FWuLWTuhG8m8iKkRInXMQqFFFsRgttG4kUh/j8Zbtzd84qr2ZjgA7DhwHqL LU9RqloU2Va0N00O2rlshj8kzJeqiewEgfpHK3efqncIMeq2X40kXV1gFCsqy7ZSqF+A 6tjA== X-Received: by 10.194.187.71 with SMTP id fq7mr313590wjc.87.1430310735462; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id es5sm38823015wjc.30.2015.04.29.05.32.14 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:32:15 -0700 (PDT) user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 in-reply-to: <874mnziapg.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186005 Archived-At: On 04/29/2015 09:08 AM, Oleh Krehel wrote: > And it works with `pop-tag-mark' too, neat. > Should #5666 be closed then? How are bugs closed, by the way? You send an email to 5666-done@debbugs.gnu.org, preferably with explanation. By the way, check out admin/notes/bugtracker.