From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should Emacs define push-tag-mark? Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 01:22:29 +0300 Message-ID: <55400825.2050301@yandex.ru> References: <87618gkrxx.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430259781 10567 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2015 22:23:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:23:01 +0000 (UTC) To: Oleh Krehel , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 29 00:23:00 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YnDu7-00029N-Pu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:22:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36043 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnDu7-0007BW-3G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35059) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnDtt-00075X-RE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:22:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnDto-0005dl-SL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:38745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnDto-0005dE-LS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:22:40 -0400 Original-Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so45722592wiu.1 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:22:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ntXrLStbpUL3x7/mSPSYS1nnCvqm+me9PHuYed2qhQk=; b=QLaHy6HtX4O6NgdWkcEdUs1HKbUsax1j49nprq+pdkd+wZ0Pj2E/35ZA/9Rt8PNq3L Dd/mKpvg8Y5jjDw6174C6YQ6WwzOi0VqF8nOLN3kjQ+Suz9BmqsVPVl6UMmMrwOnfq1S aNRv/5GKvzQ1tOdgcoJyK3+TyeKaxKC31G2LILCeM5lSE3cIRLPrdJaFwg5EEq7Qau7R PwvZBUagl3miQXtEMeZapL+8HQSGeQtK07LcbAYRb66OOrARuXeVfVgvsBroA3v1k23M 8RRW0M+vMwNm7xuRMAcOBFOWagtFYQxPH4gvO0BVzdgn7ZCEXcPgS9XCKB7+Yi1ql0Rp 8Gxg== X-Received: by 10.181.11.129 with SMTP id ei1mr33843635wid.57.1430259751027; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k2sm18390316wif.3.2015.04.28.15.22.30 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:22:30 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0 In-Reply-To: <87618gkrxx.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185988 Archived-At: On 04/28/2015 09:50 PM, Oleh Krehel wrote: > > I was just looking at why `pop-tag-mark' wasn't working after > `semantic-ia-fast-jump'. Turns out it's because GNU/Emacs doesn't > define `push-tag-mark' on which `semantic-ia-fast-jump' relies. > > Should I define this function? It would also fix #5666. In master, you can use `xref-push-marker-stack'.