From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20325: convert "fixes:debbugs:123" in log to (Bug#123) in ChangeLog Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:30:11 +0300 Message-ID: <55313513.4070704@yandex.ru> References: <0opp77menv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5530AC62.2010209@cs.ucla.edu> <5530ED9C.4010703@yandex.ru> <55312479.1060209@cs.ucla.edu> <55312773.1080307@yandex.ru> <33237A23-C3B2-40FD-9BC2-B43FEE51A2E7@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429288283 5399 80.91.229.3 (17 Apr 2015 16:31:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20325@debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert To: "Jan D." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 17 18:31:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9Ad-0002sN-Cu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:31:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42645 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9Ac-0008GE-M8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:31:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42365) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9AY-0008G8-RU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:31:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9AV-0002JF-Hb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9AV-0002J9-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9AV-0004Xy-04 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:31:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20325 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20325-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20325.142928822317378 (code B ref 20325); Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20325) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2015 16:30:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59253 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj99q-0004WD-Lt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:30:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:33061) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj99n-0004V0-B9 for 20325@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:30:20 -0400 Original-Received: by wiax7 with SMTP id x7so37674404wia.0 for <20325@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:30:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uo7gZAamuUsbt8NWU1DzM9DaHepI4BqQ6i1X7sQXlGU=; b=EStVz0mcREmbiJGmBhgbgvL6MX4wFPFnuQrohppDKFfz4iJNTKoOQTbZChE6/8wtnb oaV9TmyedPy5XTCDoZpKzRezehnH9EK5P0RW57grvbko2OIRVfsZMrdHtfqLrsNdRBb6 P3zf4e06OO1vFAYbZGIHHeLQFNUrfY2+1jyx/rvlH5PttsFub2iUlcimdiN+2bIYry8V 3IPdRZju8eODFinL6iD9vP2VfSzK5C22iuQ7BzJUe8DIPEe6NIF6lOHdjx0CP/f7UpQ7 ChcOsA336W0WKUsHpS+gEyvVERBIv3PgrPqIhA4rTLDt8HHbkxG2vMaQ74sQr0Pux0La gqyg== X-Received: by 10.180.96.196 with SMTP id du4mr2883086wib.77.1429288213730; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i10sm15300270wja.40.2015.04.17.09.30.11 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:30:12 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0 In-Reply-To: <33237A23-C3B2-40FD-9BC2-B43FEE51A2E7@swipnet.se> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101641 Archived-At: On 04/17/2015 07:20 PM, Jan D. wrote: > What about a few years from now when we switch to something other than debbugs? That's exactly the situation where having used debbugs:1234 until that point will show its benefits. > Why hardcode a specific bug reporting tool as the recommendation? Will all bugs be migrated to the new bug reporting tool? Will they keep their identifiers? Unless you're 100% sure about that, explicitly documenting which bug tracker the bugs are reported in is a useful information.