From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17284: Host name completion in shell mode take 45 seconds Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:12:07 +0200 Message-ID: <551E7587.4000103@gmx.at> References: <87a8ypixcn.fsf@yahoo.fr> <551E6D24.4020408@yahoo.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428059603 14996 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2015 11:13:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 11:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17284@debbugs.gnu.org To: Nicolas Richard , Svend Sorensen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 03 13:13:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YdzXC-0005il-S9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:13:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33598 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdzXC-0004PR-7X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53719) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdzX9-0004PH-7Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdzX5-0006JR-7L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53982) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdzX5-0006JJ-3B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YdzX4-0003gY-EH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 11:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17284 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17284-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17284.142805954414119 (code B ref 17284); Fri, 03 Apr 2015 11:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2015 11:12:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YdzWS-0003fe-9J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:12:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:61145) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YdzWP-0003fK-Nm for 17284@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:12:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [91.113.0.12] ([91.113.0.12]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LqRKT-1Z9BPS1Q0n-00e3g9; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:12:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <551E6D24.4020408@yahoo.fr> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hKP9fsUdTw87DtMFY62n5k4jg/p0/J0zvKR2g3a9xBCOJeauuvW LJ4AMIyZbgG0hO802WL7Uago9zi5rW9XDy/lWlrSWorUB9Dd20BR1dUw/HeFeSAYpzFK2fK Z+55HIAmhEIh+Tq68iMUFL/LEOV52aEj9yssBLCrWg4kfhbJERe7yl8LEwfgCxB2bv4PhHF tLLEGVKtmyppp2sOfGbPw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101151 Archived-At: > pcmpl-ssh-known-hosts: Use `char-before' instead of `looking-back'. Couldn't the byte-compiler warn when `looking-back' is used without specifying LIMIT? Making LIMIT non-optional seems too harsh. martin