From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5042: 23.1; linum-mode gives incorrect line numbers with narrowed buffers Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:07:04 -0800 Message-ID: <551D8700C30C4A80B2C9D4B11CAD32C9@us.oracle.com> References: <200911260039.nAQ0dTD1019384@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <200912100534.nBA5YSva008256@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <200912210659.nBL6xhDG020940@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <201001070538.o075cpux020583@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <201001100132.o0A1WIxG005631@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <201001162208.o0GM8Apr008065@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <201001232328.o0NNSL55029058@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264291798 431 80.91.229.12 (24 Jan 2010 00:09:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5042@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, markus.triska@gmx.at To: "'Mark Lillibridge'" , Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 24 01:09:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NYq33-0004lg-9m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:09:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33045 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NYq34-0000T6-DA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:09:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NYq2z-0000St-Q6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:09:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NYq2v-0000RY-NF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:09:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52576 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NYq2v-0000RM-II for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:09:41 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37844) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NYq2v-0004dP-DJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:09:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYq1K-0005a7-1o; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5042 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5042-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5042.126429166421444 (code B ref 5042); Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2010 00:07:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYq12-0005Zp-A8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:07:44 -0500 Original-Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com ([148.87.113.124]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYq0m-0005Zg-CN for 5042@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:07:42 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com (acsinet15.oracle.com [141.146.126.227]) by rcsinet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id o0O07Mfq030867 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:07:24 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt355.oracle.com (acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o0O079fd019594; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:07:09 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt003.oracle.com by acsmt358.oracle.com with ESMTP id 1462294321264291618; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:06:58 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/24.5.185.59) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:06:57 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <201001232328.o0NNSL55029058@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> Thread-Index: AcqchYbSJlMSkdC1Qam/QVIkKouf/AAA0eLg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Source-IP: acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090205.4B5B8F3A.00D0:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:08:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:34670 Archived-At: > What do people think? I think that the proper place to propose and discuss a potential Emacs enhancement is emacs-devel@gnu.org, not in a specific (though relevant) bug thread. There is no reason to manage this in the bug tracker, and no reason not to manage (and archive) it in the normal discussion list. Just one opinion.