From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20189: 25.0.50; Feature request: Alternative split-window-sensibly functions Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:24:07 +0100 Message-ID: <551270A7.5070601@gmx.at> References: <87iodqbvoz.fsf@gnu.org> <83384uqqao.fsf@gnu.org> <871tkd36jx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427271930 18319 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2015 08:25:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20189@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 25 09:25:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yagcm-0004l8-8x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:25:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36759 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yagcl-0004Fd-M9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49920) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yagch-0004CK-R4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:25:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yagca-0001PE-Bz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yagca-0001Om-9o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yagca-0005Sf-34 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:25:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:25:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20189 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20189-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20189.142727186220905 (code B ref 20189); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:25:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2015 08:24:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35588 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yagbt-0005R5-Lw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:24:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:60728) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yagbs-0005Qq-79 for 20189@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:24:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [178.189.204.62] ([178.189.204.62]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mcxtm-1YrfWo1aqY-00IGWY; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:24:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <871tkd36jx.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Y6T0PajW8WtOAa9LPeTwApKUdaxdDdisQrLgNVpMKxplDXVKOIq qm6GScgQMvNHAbuU2RSvFwund6PYrNrBXwPCN7XXvzMjnfNx5riqWEorUSOyAJLVaFuudvu LpuY/4LXnBjmirnJLjIBcpnlb6ek/6EV1hWpsQeqZCS5itcU7yM/hsHCCNJGvZV6Kldhd/H 98UdCpww9MYQfWCF6Tghw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100915 Archived-At: > Are explicitly created windows treated any differently than explicitly > created windows? Now that's a difficult question ... One thing `display-buffer' sets up is the 'quit-restore' window parameter which determines the future behavior of `quit-window'. C-x 2 and C-x 3 don't do that. martin