From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:36:47 -0700 Message-ID: <5511A0AF.4060503@dancol.org> References: <20150324163714.GA27775@thyrsus.com> <83y4mmpb1n.fsf@gnu.org> <55119DC0.40007@dancol.org> <83vbhqpas3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vctW4ixaETEQ1C7g0Deg3iDC0rPWhOV3r" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427218637 14698 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2015 17:37:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 24 18:37:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YaSlO-0007EV-KF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:37:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33695 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaSlN-0007NN-VA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:37:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaSl8-0007N0-Su for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:36:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaSl4-0000U3-3t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:52914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaSl3-0000Tk-Lw; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:36:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=dztZ1czHKhjlwxR0aGAD8z0dvW2WOg9X1nmDCABHA9w=; b=oB0wTl4beetHSKrb8ZvIS2S0EK5ZqG8/Tw0E4wMGz7CKSX8gZ0Ga2uIea7fxOv3Ix7my5CCw3EhnLKTxbb0QsCxy9G2s6mzIQNPek2jHaAc/F5Cvqn3MCQr2pWDmashL1elE3Ka6DLMNNGmYPcOOzESDcYYJpJ8B+CPNQwq3t9W01o4DR/VRTsDS3nP4nz0mu1tR09NIFQ0lzxwNYm5D0tu98Bx1DAY4QpqcX/hT+HcVjWVq3TbNUKvQSNEsD3yRCEe1BpyRFqvvVn4ty5aIegRMK33jUVW10M/2G4u8VQbUiigG6hWzvwl3Yhqa3CQ4OHLYLFQya4I9AzveH0FM1g==; Original-Received: from [2620:10d:c083:1004:56ee:75ff:fe20:83dc] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YaSl3-0002J5-2W; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:36:53 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 In-Reply-To: <83vbhqpas3.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184169 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vctW4ixaETEQ1C7g0Deg3iDC0rPWhOV3r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/24/2015 10:26 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:24:16 -0700 >> From: Daniel Colascione >> CC: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >>>> Yes. It would mean VC mode could not be used to work on private deve= lopment >>>> branches. >>> >>> Why cannot VC determine whether a branch is private or not? >> >> It's a matter of convention, not something vc can query. Whether I wan= t >> to push depends on a lot more than what vc, or any automated tool, can= >> figure out in the general case by sniffing around the build environmen= t. >=20 > You are answering a different question. I asked why it's hard to > determine that a branch is a private one, not to determine my intent > to push or not. "Private" is also a convention. Git doesn't distinguish "private" from "public" branches: that distinction is a matter of convention. --vctW4ixaETEQ1C7g0Deg3iDC0rPWhOV3r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVEaCvAAoJEN4WImmbpWBlPMYP/3agB+rx7rApiAZkcirI6T1T QFDt+jW62W1cNd8EPd9u40MNDkim9Y57Uu5rst6HOdVoyV8t0PuVYfhq2jNXw2xF nY3N5rHGIlqTLsB1QiWF55yKbYyiIyeS0+mB8q+egbGWEOVh8TXwt80/m2HsetTy jOXLi0DhbvlLO3v5s07jGEOR1CwmPqGY/la6rqxuHrkTK3LRggD4VHqWUSjkecbs 0e2oWtMYKTb5PP2/NGnUhrI1EB5BXf5draDLhTixlrM+peulWQprL98puvaz0cqG +AQNmI58vUtvAfsCG/IUpWR+/xcuyCvYvKXEXEWyhlG6rig4NbfX46vvQe57FWfz fbYAH8jvU3uUYgR3L5TUbhv6zTBabYLKkwTiGJ4PUoRiu6n/n/3zzFNlPF58sRtF hWpx3uVRbgGqgwXq699v/UpoRDPVUwdg0zw7ZGbJfzLr5est12RmA4lABg24/Xwr VkpOoNRTuQnftiksqju3Xqrn2vdzAQBKuMypyK/YmKlgkA6ajGnbU/TZt+8sv9X1 ROSqVk9hHk/PM6BbZRnq+WZm9ImND8Nady9ZX2qK7L3jWKXy9PGnKPVpXBCWXFht Vmx78o/KyO6K3YS+ySxgov5Kwx6soYopKNaHxEFuWmkRBico4x2Lfw+0jlmTfsbd Vgwn9r4yFgtPikL1zkoh =M7qe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vctW4ixaETEQ1C7g0Deg3iDC0rPWhOV3r--