From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Petr Hracek Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20124: Building emacs and libjpeg not found on Fedora 22 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:47:10 +0100 Message-ID: <5507F81E.1070704@redhat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426585714 28654 80.91.229.3 (17 Mar 2015 09:48:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:48:34 +0000 (UTC) To: 20124@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 17 10:48:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo6k-0006OZ-QQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:48:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53543 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo6c-0003sz-PF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo6Z-0003st-2I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo6U-000630-MM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo6U-00062t-IT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo6U-0005ll-6H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Petr Hracek Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 20124 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.142658564722129 (code B ref -1); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2015 09:47:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49196 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo5v-0005kp-9G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44370) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo5t-0005ki-Kf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:47:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo5s-0005t9-0T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:47:25 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:53177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo5r-0005t5-Tl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:47:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46081) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo5n-0003m3-2N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:47:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo5i-0005rR-91 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:47:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXo5i-0005r3-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:47:14 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 307868E3D0 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from [10.34.4.133] (unused-4-133.brq.redhat.com [10.34.4.133]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2H9lAYf007310 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:47:11 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100578 Archived-At: I am trying to build emacs with following parameters in configuration script. ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-dbus --with-gif --with-jpeg --with-png --with-rsvg --with-tiff --with-xft --with-xpm --with-x-toolkit=gtk3 --with-gpm=no It fails with: configure: error: The following required libraries were not found: libjpeg Maybe some development libraries/packages are missing? If you don't want to link with them give --with-jpeg=no as options to configure I have installed following libjpeg versions: libjpeg-turbo-1.4.0-1.fc22 libjpeg-turbo-devel-1.4.0-1.fc22. (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=605282) The first package delivers SO libraries like so.62.0 second one delivers headers and libjpeg.so library Do you have any idea where could be a problem? Greetings Petr -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phracek@redhat.com