From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PL support Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 18:57:02 +0300 Message-ID: <54c4c438-c6e9-b303-a620-47441bf9f2d2@yandex.ru> References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <878silajdl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tv18pyh4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83zhaih0oz.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnbegsvm.fsf@gnu.org> <83imh5hby1.fsf@gnu.org> <2e4e8ce9-d857-f3e3-31cf-a40dee67bd25@yandex.ru> <83y2q1dsvh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="92469"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 Cc: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Philippe Vaucher , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 09 18:02:05 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXRvR-000NwT-2P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 18:02:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36016 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXRvP-0006Wx-AT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 12:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXRqd-0002LO-FM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 11:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::429]:38502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXRqc-0004eQ-OI; Sat, 09 May 2020 11:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id x17so5476836wrt.5; Sat, 09 May 2020 08:57:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+RM2qrw6VkMMTmnYkHwaUbeQOlxUS5J0IXn894cvT48=; b=CE7dr/Xb0chL0uhsxK5GrmKlhDKdvNHXOoUAhUHldY5ZvCFDbPUjDR6OStNeP0j4VR 0f8ymbAaD4LupuzytnERhz7PZZ8earVSrhb2iR/irPAScxzspLw4r8wAlJr0n5t/U4QU ZfbRVw6F13u5+H8XR6+vrvulCrGDs/03ljrGB724jsU9VAyP1cSOsGKpkU7sxNScRmT6 n8JIfQ0+ZUWo8Cw+PA1qovnI6KTtrM9lFFPlMe362h7uHi1nYC+yNzUJcn8SJ3hyX+Ry CWVYc51lscvMJJH+C/kY7ka5/9VLjaiN4iD7G0/dEs9ERSxP7B+guKfpz+YFp0HXxSK/ /s6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+RM2qrw6VkMMTmnYkHwaUbeQOlxUS5J0IXn894cvT48=; b=dbox96ayomqMrID8y/MqatCRyX3C4fWvj7C/ieRf91e4a4454GN9ZoW4VXdSiWmIIF fLNMJBKEuP55AMvTRg5yMxKFVlf9kwK5mve38E8IFTpZYmYemixUR9BhlFa3T3v13VqZ kAzoKL+orGSB2GjJnqjZNDaGTroThlfsEAdaze99I9JbKIvEF6uXRe6PA7+bax4vgH3H 9HeQCChpevPhJolMXbqTAsWiafLaFDZZ/x+RfddsbroqnzRMFOWu4aq8ONXy/ypXNKoy /pvnLD/fW95A6LbiSOJvzo2LwwfcfsQ/wUJu6xZlZhrpfoz1e3OfyQg44PkM/ffz/V4M c5YQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZEBszhH1cfZHmhN3eLl3VbjaU0aNROWIMIEfEhl7y+OETwqE3w QNtcsmQi8WIvmDYQsVZolu8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJbKXHcOVk0XOxHgWSseTaPkBwT/8E7lmqYJ8sm+3z4lKpwGzWbDB2UG6HFOqUif78BR7isgQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:654a:: with SMTP id z10mr8634733wrv.234.1589039824818; Sat, 09 May 2020 08:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h188sm20175383wme.8.2020.05.09.08.57.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 May 2020 08:57:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::429; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x429.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249487 Archived-At: On 09.05.2020 18:39, Philippe Vaucher wrote: > Sorry to sound like captain obvious, but shouldn't we contact the > people athttps://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode and work with them on > this? Maybe that's already the case? I know there are also other > repositories with more or less the same goal. Adding it to Emacs doesn't look feasible, but we should collaborate anyway. For example, to make sure that using lsp-mode with Emacs doesn't become harder in the future. It's a shame, though. With lsp-ui, they have created some interesting new UI elements that we could benefit from.