From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Daiki Ueno" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7 (was: New Emacs facilities from Gnus) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:15:51 +0900 Message-ID: <54a15d860711010115k10445da7g8f0f3d663e8a315e@mail.gmail.com> References: <87zly3y4ru.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87odejy30k.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193904968 8660 80.91.229.12 (1 Nov 2007 08:16:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ted Zlatanov , miles@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 01 09:16:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1InVDl-00025s-58 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:16:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InVDb-0004KH-2a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1InVDX-0004Jo-JN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1InVDU-0004J2-Rt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:15:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InVDU-0004Iz-NW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:15:52 -0400 Original-Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.234]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1InVDU-0001V2-Cw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:15:52 -0400 Original-Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f1so326879nzc for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:15:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=qogZJuDFz1DJNPkDXcWXlOfJjhIYMLOsv0wGq5d5fgw=; b=b2b9+RF3/jiSP5ACAAY0TvREhwLdzDXU13ka9/gUDwdNfgXgWpzqTWx7mIZYupbTzHUQ33rQn+67YaKwWFgwUwdOkGhIFfYEr0mjTcthNNjEF5BdBKKGBCkCr4v60Jf02yOO0wDeJXu/nM2dIFogsd8sTY6G9n3D65J6mX0B99E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=F4usn3nmjWaXkwJATcQHb5vV5WrPwL7bF7/LNNzDKTSYALBUYPxS6weh8/Lfi9EJyZeIwqthgfOibnNdEFU4Y4ppEP3hiznUpp2jBxSrpHroz52ECted9oZL1ORFXQ26dDXxSrvFQAKADP51UxPChJFr5neFaxopfHdogaF+7JM= Original-Received: by 10.142.229.4 with SMTP id b4mr28809wfh.1193904951123; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:15:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.142.213.14 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:15:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2bb172be4082cbeb X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82293 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65517 Archived-At: 2007/11/1, Richard Stallman : > There was a disagreement about password.el, but I don't remember > what the issue was. Can someone please find that thread and tell > me the subject and date, so I can review the mail? Perhaps this thread: Simon Josefsson installed password.el in net/. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-10/msg00702.html He made a change to read-passwd to depend on password.el. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-10/msg01049.html You said that the change was not fit in subr.el. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-10/msg01132.html Simon backed out the above two changes. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-10/msg01377.html So, if this thread is appropriate one and IIUC, password.el itself was not disagreed while it was not liked to change read-passwd to cache passwords. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno