From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19988: 25.0.50; Drag events ending in different frame Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:05:26 +0100 Message-ID: <54F80E46.8070705@gmx.at> References: <87k2yycfwh.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3t5q11o.fsf@gnu.org> <87mw3tfdn8.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw3sptht.fsf@gnu.org> <87egp44gh5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425542796 31134 80.91.229.3 (5 Mar 2015 08:06:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19988@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 05 09:06:25 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQnS-0006cG-39 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:06:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49499 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQnM-0002QN-Ep for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:06:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47119) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQnD-0002FV-I6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:06:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQnC-0005c8-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:06:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQnC-0005c0-LX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQnC-0005h1-DF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19988 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19988-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19988.142554274721842 (code B ref 19988); Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19988) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2015 08:05:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35536 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQmx-0005gE-4n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:05:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:59001) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTQmv-0005fk-0C for 19988@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:05:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.255.182] ([62.47.255.182]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LaKaw-1Xl2ci0EMY-00lzRu; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:05:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:9dH86svSgLWCm/fEEaWtTNUvrj3pBf7dkYXIgdr2Y7DNY5cfzto JUNUK3V1b+EGckLOtvgG5ocuFzyrOnxufMleE9OGijba85LIA/vwASaDLAPfO47iyUMLTYU +x4aHnCHk0fpIi52e1oB55vGsxGGTx+AB2JCCJ6o+rUfc/Rm+DHKqGZMfE3BAz5NjRKkoja CKpdiUweP+lz8GtvUSU9g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100084 Archived-At: > Actually, it's more subtle than that: if I move into another frame which > hides part of the selected window, the drag keeps working (as long as > I stay within the bounds of the originally selected window, even though > I don't get to see some of those bounds because they're hidden by > another frame). But that's expected? > Oh, and there's yet another subtlety: if, during the drag, you move the > mouse out of the selected frame, the drag seems to freeze indeed, but if > you then move your mouse higher/lower than the frame the text gets > scrolled and the drag does take place (even if you release the mouse > while it's outside of the originally selected frame/window). And that's the behavior I see with all applications that allow expanding highlighted text with the mouse. martin