From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] for review - making use of {EXEEXT} more uniform in makefiles. Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:27:09 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <54E7B4BD.4090308@cs.ucla.edu> References: <54E79986.4000909@cs.ucla.edu> <54E7AE0A.6090402@cumego.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1424471266 32158 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2015 22:27:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 22:27:46 +0000 (UTC) To: =?UTF-8?B?UHJ6ZW15c8WCYXcgV29qbm93c2tp?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 20 23:27:37 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YOw2r-0004fM-8G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 23:27:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34408 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOw2q-0008W0-NB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:27:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOw2f-0008Vk-6k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:27:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOw2Z-0007nG-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:27:25 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:53922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOw2Z-0007nA-D5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:27:19 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FF1A6000A; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:27:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lUHWlYjyZe7Y; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:27:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-100-32-155-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [100.32.155.148]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E376A60006; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:27:17 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <54E7AE0A.6090402@cumego.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.62 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183336 Archived-At: Przemys=C5=82aw Wojnowski wrote: > Is a ChangeLog entry needed when a patch touches only the tests? When in doubt about ChangeLogs, the answer is "yes". :-) Generally speaking, git commit messages should use ChangeLog format, and = a patch=20 that changes tests should have ChangeLog entries. See, for example, comm= it=20 e7d21b4ab11e73c709420eeeb32ffe2421fafe98 here: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=3De7d21b4ab11e73c70= 9420eeeb32ffe2421fafe98