From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: package.el dependencies Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:44:44 +0200 Message-ID: <54D0B4AC.6020802@yandex.ru> References: <87wq4dpqib.fsf@gmail.com> <87wq44su8v.fsf@gmail.com> <878ugj7ajz.fsf@gmail.com> <874mr67gjb.fsf@gmail.com> <87oapervqv.fsf@gmail.com> <877fw2kp1y.fsf@gmail.com> <87d25tps2q.fsf@gmail.com> <87bnlc3tbq.fsf@gmail.com> <54CFEA81.1050603@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422963903 21199 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2015 11:45:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel , Stefan Monnier , Thierry Volpiatto To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 03 12:44:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YIbub-0003kM-Vn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:44:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58815 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIbua-0004cl-Uo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 06:44:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIbuX-0004cU-7M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 06:44:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIbuS-0002fA-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 06:44:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]:49683) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIbuS-0002f4-Mj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 06:44:48 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id k11so42049950wes.2 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 03:44:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xuVf7iE2JRDT8+NK7cNZjAmDZUcloQnG5TyAXxaHP3c=; b=qGapTdJ/FpIdyOh2I2UfjqLyxOocMQqmMO3kmC8ll+16W3u6MWMSWCr8NO6rAqww1n US+T3El9JHJV+36spKACUhzq3mqOJ7i144i/GtZ1cY+UPSzDufnEYUwgO4BvHA3zTKRY ydY+ZWICoT022mgOl5vRkjcafBwF7LCJlsyNWlgn6+8N7tLHG9+tYdob3AlpbWx6p/UK 7fdODmXm2jHWZ7BobqZ8s3KGVI8QtnIdO0jmKMU+2sJ/LOVff9ZwU8ez1BgDzFPpQghT TxwZGls+BsIolXMEMh5bPb8zyIt5ScsIua92N0cG+fHNNcVBSYmp6jKC/a/7rltP6sKo 3hqA== X-Received: by 10.194.2.75 with SMTP id 11mr54441271wjs.78.1422963887842; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 03:44:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g10sm24223914wic.7.2015.02.03.03.44.46 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Feb 2015 03:44:47 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/33.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182323 Archived-At: On 02/03/2015 01:39 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > Good point. Done. Thanks! > 2015-02-02 21:22 GMT+00:00 Dmitry Gutov : >> On 02/02/2015 11:19 PM, Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >>> >>> >>> Stefan Monnier writes: >>> >>>> Looks good, feel free to install. See some further comments below. >>> >>> >>> The version of package--get-deps Arthur pushed (he modify original >>> version) returns many duplicates and I am not sure it recurse correctly, >> >> >> Could either of your write a test or two for this feature? >> >> Then it'll be much easier to be sure the related functions work and "recurse >> correctly".