From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: package.el dependencies Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:22:09 +0200 Message-ID: <54CFEA81.1050603@yandex.ru> References: <87wq4dpqib.fsf@gmail.com> <87wq44su8v.fsf@gmail.com> <878ugj7ajz.fsf@gmail.com> <874mr67gjb.fsf@gmail.com> <87oapervqv.fsf@gmail.com> <877fw2kp1y.fsf@gmail.com> <87d25tps2q.fsf@gmail.com> <87bnlc3tbq.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422912144 3102 80.91.229.3 (2 Feb 2015 21:22:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 21:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel To: Thierry Volpiatto , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 02 22:22:23 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YIORp-0007xD-1g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 22:22:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56768 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIORo-0002nT-98 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:22:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45935) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIORl-0002nM-24 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:22:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIORg-0005YC-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:22:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]:35128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIORg-0005Y2-NN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:22:12 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l61so41435882wev.13 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:22:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DU9gU2iDb8v+ezhWZxj01UxZg3wbb0bey0IgtC6YMKA=; b=c6nvSfYS9EgTBGynAYDN8jAWzSI+b+HEP9zLVKPVaSls9CLV21BT+3kWNIs+jfaD9D ii4vtXi1JWb0iRTvDrbyBEAOzcqBgULUtG18FltZMIg5PBWXZxXGDF14C0Hgegvn+pXX 6loChf4oHkozSJiT+3ryN9Tc/v/F3CbrrqXWn42vzEtUlxiHzFruboA7FGXzz09QnP4e hFpBwy2GhY1W528LMB4bdUgoQG7X4AGMN7USebdSbnyqtBOzqsIyya1b5lqRoM9eDCwW iuDK7/e+SftD3c9RrryASUhqjXHTisowc4AcOhwXZNxsrla35c04hfhIkgDhjSN1PbJ/ DeIA== X-Received: by 10.180.84.162 with SMTP id a2mr25128299wiz.47.1422912132181; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:22:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lk2sm21555553wic.22.2015.02.02.13.22.10 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:22:11 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/33.0 In-Reply-To: <87bnlc3tbq.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182293 Archived-At: On 02/02/2015 11:19 PM, Thierry Volpiatto wrote: > > Stefan Monnier writes: > >> Looks good, feel free to install. See some further comments below. > > The version of package--get-deps Arthur pushed (he modify original > version) returns many duplicates and I am not sure it recurse correctly, Could either of your write a test or two for this feature? Then it'll be much easier to be sure the related functions work and "recurse correctly".