On 01/22/2015 01:52 AM, Oleh wrote:
>> Speaking of things that ship with Emacs: have you tried
>> prettify-symbols-mode?
>>
> 
> No need, I've had it for years with the approach that I describe here:
> http://oremacs.com/2015/01/11/pretty-elisp-regex/

Sure. My point is that existence of prettify-symbols-mode and equivalent
is another argument against the creation of a shorter-than-lambda
function literal syntax.

(By the way: the idea of a mode that hides backslashes in string
literals scares me. I'd much rather just use rx.)