From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6130: 23.1; artist-mode spray-can malfunction Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:22:22 +0100 Message-ID: <54BF61BE.5000307@gmx.at> References: <8dd014e7478827e94e3a8fe5b2b948e0@lysator.liu.se> <54BA6A0A.4080408@gmx.at> <54BB8375.9000506@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421828595 9453 80.91.229.3 (21 Jan 2015 08:23:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6130@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Koning Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 21 09:23:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YDqZD-0003PE-GH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:23:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47012 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDqZC-0006xW-I2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:23:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDqZ9-0006xN-5j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:23:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDqZ5-0002en-5x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:23:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDqZ4-0002dl-SE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDqZ4-0008Ny-H8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6130 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6130-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6130.142182856132201 (code B ref 6130); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6130) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2015 08:22:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51272 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDqYj-0008NJ-32 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:22:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:54585) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDqYg-0008My-66 for 6130@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:22:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [178.190.18.57] ([178.190.18.57]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MgXCF-1YP4gV0DwN-00O2tn; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:22:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:TyIbyXYC+sj+TaPUHwjJD6j8FoXQXYGkfJpoaHfQ9adtSvdM8eh RFLuNYPaz5xXoX7+hgabYIz13H+IuamM3hh/kF5qdBqPaKjHoLQs7AJ8jRg1vsKGAYKj6o2 yBGSCetFFu8VXohtCRh/2vpS3LHUnRObb06rNN+Zejh9W6Rjo/yYZxm7KzhaqsMKcyCWa2s CpUwfwdFjVegwuJcw+h6Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98537 Archived-At: > Okay, but I think this should be a reasonably high priority for the > maintainers of this part of the lisp tree. Aren't there likely to be > quite a few undiscovered bugs, some perhaps quite destructive, that > result from following the behavior as it was documented, just as there > are (presumably) places where new bugs would manifest if `posnp' were > brought in line with its advertised behavior? In any case, I've appended > a FIXME comment in addition to revising the docstring. Thanks. I slightly tweaked the doc-string of `posnp' to make its first line fit. We can change the behavior of `posnp' for Emacs 25 as soon as you received your confirmation from the FSF. > I added the log entry to the highest-level ChangeLog file, since I > edited files in lisp/ and doc/ (even though the doc/ changes were only > in reference to functionality implemented under lisp/). Is that right? Not really. But the way of writing ChangeLog entries will change in the near future anyway so there's not much use to tell you the precise details. I used your entry to create more appropriate ones. I pushed your changes to the Emacs-24 branch as commit 4c09e3a..3ea1b31 emacs-24 -> emacs-24 They should appear on trunk/master with the next merge. Please have a look, my experience with git is still rather poor. If you think I've done everything right, please close the bug. Thanks, martin