From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On tabs and spaces Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:43:03 +0300 Message-ID: <54B799B7.6040004@yandex.ru> References: <54B6FA42.6000608@yandex.ru> <87a91kfjry.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <54B793B0.8070909@yandex.ru> <871tmwfigt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421318613 32656 80.91.229.3 (15 Jan 2015 10:43:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 15 11:43:28 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YBhtg-0000SZ-1g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:43:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50018 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBhtf-000051-By for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 05:43:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBhtQ-0008Vr-Uz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 05:43:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBhtO-0003OV-8l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 05:43:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]:55996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBhtN-0003ON-Vv; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 05:43:10 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id ge10so3087328lab.5; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 02:43:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NDy9dPG6t+qGmj7ZMK+vNdkjU7DizrJcw91y7ToNPLQ=; b=J8Xq5A0yc23CqyNRImqvoIgjgjLCe5VvthlrXfo4VqdfZsADO/0Ya3Drx+nya0qjcp AN9MFiZhmLYEjz0g+7E4gTyiNKdf8/ZgD/o+bpEOn7hV821igakTexsxl62wcRz8n02N ZRVvJURfmJ2FA/Yv4zrON7d4TbHubCuKpNe09jCmHXoD1aWXjem3gEKnHR8s981b/xfL OFOS8jtXtlnRw6aE+5SFdfkPyQ1swOl8O7oE/K1tTOTQF6j779TbUA9vFPlK8+ZhaPoy YnK8ZF/E8gNSzp0sbmhvBcgOHSrmnqgTReqjHgEyy+GweB3lkVlih0Zww1HU51CiG7Cx +FXQ== X-Received: by 10.112.26.135 with SMTP id l7mr8779616lbg.56.1421318589167; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 02:43:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ch1sm444439lbb.40.2015.01.15.02.43.08 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 02:43:08 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/33.0 In-Reply-To: <871tmwfigt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181287 Archived-At: On 01/15/2015 01:26 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Once you factor the time of C-x v g into the equation, the 5.5s of > difference are not all that impressive. On my computer, previous to > version 2.1 we were talking about about 5 _minutes_ of runtime. Still inconvenient, though. And maybe we also care about the developers with older versions of Git, for now. The improvement is impressive, to be sure. > Emacs > doesn't use -w by default when doing C-x v g either IIRC. Getting it in > there is somewhat cumbersome. Using it by default would be a trivial change. And with http://debbugs.gnu.org/17945, vc-annotate will be more customizable.