From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19554: 25.0.50; void-function xref-marker-stack-empty-p and subsequent abort Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:33:17 +0100 Message-ID: <54B12A1D.3060103@gmx.at> References: <54B11070.6050504@gmx.at> <8361ce7rtu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420896860 27645 80.91.229.3 (10 Jan 2015 13:34:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19554@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 10 14:34:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9wBB-00049J-Is for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:34:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55094 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9wBA-0007n4-P7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 08:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9wB5-0007mn-T8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 08:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9wB0-0001eh-PF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 08:34:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60459) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9wB0-0001eW-Mp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 08:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9wB0-0002RX-5h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 08:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19554 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19554-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19554.14208968209351 (code B ref 19554); Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19554) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2015 13:33:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41592 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9wAd-0002Ql-Q5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 08:33:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:64878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9wAb-0002Qc-F9 for 19554@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 08:33:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [88.117.56.91] ([88.117.56.91]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZOan-1YUcui2O45-00LEkr; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:33:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8361ce7rtu.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:GLO3mA5Sk/SM8HuA8kyaR4VWT877205JGVbP418vYY6+O0Dp5/W iVJc5XRAQP4P9HkinlSJaCj2nUjsKKLQtVG5dkjNjRsz4RGZi4qanhhDqy6mbTm6sj3//dw 1/ZhonwonXHkRvXVxv1ryrOcjRCai++B14YTvajNB4Xua4oWHCva3C89hOFx2f1UZ+XwGpj ptqeekiuAphzcuBTSb4xw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98172 Archived-At: > Calling the Lisp debugger in some sensitive place during creating a > frame is known to cause this. If you can track this down and see > why we increment the reference count of the new frame where we > shouldn't, or declare the frame "official" too soon, perhaps this can > be fixed. But it's a low-priority issue, because this assertion > disappears in an optimized binary anyway. I suppose it's the same as bug#10296 then. > The main problem to tackle > is why do you get a Lisp error in this scenario -- that's the real > problem to fix. Indeed. Another clue might be that when I try to access the menu bar with the mouse I get Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function xref-marker-stack-empty-p) (xref-marker-stack-empty-p) (not (xref-marker-stack-empty-p)) martin