From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19531: 25.0.50; Extra characters in keypress input (related to #18345) Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 07:22:15 +0100 Message-ID: <54AF7397.2010803@swipnet.se> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420784623 27306 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2015 06:23:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 06:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19531@debbugs.gnu.org To: Greg Smolyn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 09 07:23:36 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9SyX-0003Qe-Vx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 07:23:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49214 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9SyX-0007c7-15 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 01:23:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49225) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9SyU-0007c2-1z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 01:23:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9SyN-00073x-5S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 01:23:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59501) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9SyN-00073r-2I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 01:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9SyM-00060A-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 01:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Jan D." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 06:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19531 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19531-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19531.142078454523016 (code B ref 19531); Fri, 09 Jan 2015 06:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19531) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2015 06:22:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9Sxk-0005zA-Hk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 01:22:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailfe04.swip.net ([212.247.154.97]:46712 helo=swip.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9Sxh-0005z0-Hc for 19531@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 01:22:22 -0500 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Original-Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe04.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 562003401; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 07:22:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98121 Archived-At: Greg Smolyn skrev den 2015-01-08 20:09: > If you look at the repro in #18345, it is the same scenario when Simon > Carter removed the emacs_abort() in the apploopnr > 1 check. I get > extra characters in the input. There was no step by step instructions there either. > > Should I perhaps reopen that bug instead? This is fone. > > Unfortunately I don't know entirely how to do this without helm > projectile. Would you like me to send instructions on how to set it up > for a reproduction case? I am more than happy to do that. > Put the instructions here where they belong. It is good for future reference. Jan D.