From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19404: 25.0.50; Gnus shows self-signed certificate warning when connecting to Gmane Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:56:24 +0200 Message-ID: <54931548.3060705@yandex.ru> References: <86ppbhrx9a.fsf@yandex.ru> <838ui5uf27.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbl8uau2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418925451 32271 80.91.229.3 (18 Dec 2014 17:57:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19404@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 18 18:57:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fKC-0002WF-VG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:57:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55155 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fKC-0007z4-4Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:57:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fK1-0007vp-HB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:57:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fJu-0000Eh-22 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:57:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41109) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fJt-0000Ed-Vj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:57:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fJt-0005qn-Ph for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:57:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19404 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19404-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19404.141892539022448 (code B ref 19404); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19404) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2014 17:56:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50474 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fJO-0005px-06 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:56:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:43512) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1fJL-0005pi-Go for 19404@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:56:28 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so2600196wiv.17 for <19404@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:56:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7oxCAFCLuNww+Jz9cOR9/aejU+3qJEOJrHipE+s37s4=; b=I3hzsflDT1DayOz9yz6wfy/r3yuIqOreY7fzT9TYSCFyBLTrT32z8p71LwrRdhcnlV 0XwXvXAU3clDOExm6JGhJ4a6BzibXMc14lIqo4g+rjkhPtJnEkatS4BSU4yNZgzI6dB/ iuMK+s3CE1YK3C9jVBfSUniwQ2ET290xGICIMGufdhmNvSI99WPzRqs43Jpo13Z47pz/ Hq91uL6ll7cqQvwSm90tYFIcb8lcqJkUNKYeiwDC1s7Of8w13nvds7cxGw6nFLege3km LXs+d6MCzBWKGx2ASFS2Jd0w8CrXdHdtz675zObzJ56fF+7f7wQa4x2+I5Jg4Zc8/9gp PWGQ== X-Received: by 10.194.80.68 with SMTP id p4mr6936787wjx.108.1418925386782; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:56:26 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm9763090wjb.34.2014.12.18.09.56.25 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:56:26 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 In-Reply-To: <83vbl8uau2.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97537 Archived-At: On 12/18/2014 07:28 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > OK, let me rephrase: How can a user, a mere mortal, like myself or > Dmitry, tell that this certificate is OK, while the one I was > presented in my problem is not? Web browser vendors have simply decided that a self-signed certificate is never okay. That's why I'm surprised by the answer to this report. Also because obtaining a properly signed certificate is relatively easy these days.