From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Generators (iterators) for Gnu Emacs Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 23:51:53 -0800 Message-ID: <54840719.5080209@dancol.org> References: <877fy77zhp.fsf@web.de> <87k326d4ww.fsf@gmail.com> <877fy6rp2o.fsf@web.de> <548230FB.40307@dancol.org> <5482C872.5010304@dancol.org> <5483C537.3010707@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KDUorPX4ho8Wx1kJWW7OpIR92B2AGl58D" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417938729 22773 80.91.229.3 (7 Dec 2014 07:52:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 07:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 07 08:52:03 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XxWdN-0005NR-KP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:52:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57255 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XxWdN-0003dC-9t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 02:52:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59401) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XxWdK-0003d7-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 02:51:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XxWdJ-0002Bw-Mm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 02:51:58 -0500 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:48556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XxWdJ-0002Bh-DN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 02:51:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=AmuvgrStGe+OjRxgbEW0U8fwm1ZWiWaJHPSF9GxJHcY=; b=JjhTwF/RvkyqbgCZQw+drsNeYCNexcyINTXLn0dXBzcc+SXoijvUm3VtT/NhSLVD6IRndT5+NZfyMR0lRNIFwvjDojGsaPMLtkGEj4MJjrxVRUL7WDaSQrZEohXSDs1X5EJuvBkE6Lvm+LGp8h01d1r/yiItLX3a/3mYGM+wsGD5fW7EESPUItqIx1IiQnwatgkR7YkWqK5LtOz6bUL9rZkEN4xLQpC/4+onSLfdOZcr3uuoxix1bNTzq+zATCgeElTPpRSw99OLuftZ2PqaZqNgi5aJc62SXvfQTBxKpWWoMLsq42KsTqTkabKkgz3jncmSI62BOiKyZxvRyG79VA==; Original-Received: from [2601:8:b200:688::2b1] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XxWdG-0005G1-Ax; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 23:51:54 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179237 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KDUorPX4ho8Wx1kJWW7OpIR92B2AGl58D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/06/2014 10:12 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> you insist that additions to the Emacs core look like a bowl of corned= >> beef hash, with chunks of `iter-'-this and `seq-' that embedded all >> over the code for no good reason. >=20 > Indeed I do. And you're really not interested in a discussion of your motives or the circumstance under which you'd make an exception, are you? That's supposed to motivate more contributions to core? Another recent thread mentions the problem of too little development happening in-tree. I wonder why that might be the case. --KDUorPX4ho8Wx1kJWW7OpIR92B2AGl58D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUhAcZAAoJEN4WImmbpWBlbs0P/iRnk8Fr5yPCnJlhezk7c+4M SU8RMzvbN0wHB9FYW1AqBCjOn8YowSTBota0/tTAhInWY8d09nlePGbCinMU26x2 FGJtn5RD7SGGcARVOUqN82RCk/F47Bv0doWOOMwdYJEgnn/wU94bMHHl0Wz0UXzM B2K/o44kVVPkkJauhKGUIflUNdKG/5g9C6aYOcYvgyAsFQxoJoFPyACy3ILFfOoy l7FUKhLZq2Yn0L73Q5PbZYCA4qc5jvnkJ8xMfvGWuOOQBbsQkdlCDKP2NImEiORo CwYDGFi0iD1TZKsrZK2IYFQK3dLLtbuDS1yEv/Dqa7pXxzmyxN+gpV1nVfZ730b2 WR8D+Kcn2ndxhBllaEwH0fdJ/ugkgCvlxb7KvJU3Rq1oBKWbxNTg8zGMM/2WhwGn +TEkKjtZLcmvP/Cy5uW4/RYpIVrW+Bbs7k+RWqhJf4F0nPnnTt65Jvn7l1Q83Lbq eM+BjEazLNS2Jo51RwVlmLsoeiSBGyUIkkVuW4yuV06ChVAP90SpLijPqizjGXBr qAn1B2QI5GZmc7pJauk/XWYZBuvzTPjgWAI1RbdgoojQstwlHkN+KLgH+0eWYUrW 81gflfDUQPQ5AWk8142vbXCeNtg8f4IaPAESU7YOYFBq5qp3lk6g1eO6qtJzNq0q II+Zw2B9JnRZidGZ7P0S =Jbbm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KDUorPX4ho8Wx1kJWW7OpIR92B2AGl58D--