On 12/04/2014 09:42 PM, Leo Liu wrote:
> On 2014-12-04 20:55 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Thanks.  Looks good.  I generally prefer adding packages to GNU ELPA,
>> but I guess it also makes sense to add this directly to Emacs.
> 
> Isn't this a iterator (or stream) instead of generator?
> 
> Having generator would be great. Daniel, how mature is your generator
> package?

It works well. The code generation in the CPS portions is fairly inefficient, but I don't think it matters all that much. Subroutines are compiled normally, of course, as are sub-forms that never yield.