Re: My plans for VC mode

[Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>]

On 11/22/2014 06:37 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:

> vc-state is likely to surivive with unaltered semantics.  So is diff.

Ok. I'm also using `vc-diff-internal', `vc-buffer-sync' and 
`vc-exec-after', but these seem to be less relevant to the current subject.

> `dir-status' and `dir-status-files', on the other hand...there is a comment
> in vc.el that reads:
>
>      ;; - Another important thing: merge all the status-like backend operations.
>      ;;   We should remove dir-status, state, and dir-status-files, and
>      ;;   replace them with just `status' which takes a fileset and a continuation
>      ;;   (like dir-status) and returns a buffer in which the process(es) are run
>      ;;   (or nil if it worked synchronously).
>
> I think this is a good thing to aim at.

The above list includes `state', which you're saying won't be changed 
much. Other than that, do you mean `dir-status' and `dir-status-files' 
will be merged?

If that means that the new function will behave just like `dir-status' 
when passed a nil (or a directory) instead of a list of files, then how 
that's much better than keeping the functions separate? The downside is 
obvious, meanwhile (API breakage).