From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: git commit/push and VC Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:24:56 +0100 Message-ID: <546F12F8.3080708@gmx.at> References: <871toysqyq.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <838uj57u5b.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppchd9dk.fsf@Gertrud.fritz.box> <83fvdd612c.fsf@gnu.org> <546EF69B.20303@gmx.at> <83mw7k53e5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416565544 3659 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2014 10:25:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stromeko@nexgo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 21 11:25:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XrlPF-0003g1-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:25:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39856 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrlPE-0001Up-Ml for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:25:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33157) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrlOr-0001UE-R4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:25:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrlOk-00047Z-1h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:25:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:51087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrlOj-00043h-Mm; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:25:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [188.23.127.55] ([188.23.127.55]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MWgND-1XSpdj001z-00Xry0; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:25:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83mw7k53e5.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:nhZG8qQGYqjlaYSmZ5aZnlEyxB7KsrKAVQB7r1Gpd+aH3ktb6Q9 p5E+xyOOQ3I/uTY2pJ2j+bFDH7sUgaZnu4uxxOmDyO74408gkgfr+c78rFbRM+jhZ0ToSpI KyNfMVJfM7VQ9wq/6lonJ0JHlWAQhY/cIMoZS8FQ2/IItIUO40pjyNeuiqAtPIur51k8N+8 Iwp4B5Km5NPjYUT2WV4jQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177931 Archived-At: > Are you using "make -jN"? If not, I highly recommend trying that. On > a Core i7 system, "make -j6" (if you have XP) or "make -j8" (Windows 7 > and later) can work wonders on your build time. I can try that next time. But my last bootstrap before the git switch was a couple of months ago, so I doubt it would matter much. >> Having touched one C header file means that rebuilding takes almost >> 10 minutes here. > > That's strange: compiling C sources is very fast, most of the > bootstrap time is spent compiling Lisp. Compiling Lisp files has never been an annoyance to me. It's my impression that I spend most of the time entering and leaving directories, loading files, updating subdirectories, generating autoloads, checking whether files have changed. And configuring, if necessary. > What kind of CPU do you have > there? Windows XP here runs on a 1.80GHz Pentium Dual CPU. > Of course, it's useful: for branches that don't diverge too much from > the branch you fork off, like feature branches, for example. I yet have to find out whether that's the case here. >> Among others, the switch to MSYS has made building on Windows slow down >> by a factor of two here (at least that's the impression I get). > > If "make -jN" is not speedy enough, consider replacing your work disk > with an SSD. The build will fly. ;-) martin